Background: The purpose of this study is to provide evidence-based and expert consensus recommendations for lung ultrasound with focus on emergency and critical care settings. Methods: A multidisciplinary panel of 28 experts from eight countries was involved. Literature was reviewed from January 1966 to June 2011. Consensus members searched multiple databases including Pubmed, Medline, OVID, Embase, and others. The process used to develop these evidence-based recommendations involved two phases: determining the level of quality of evidence and developing the recom- mendation. The quality of evidence is assessed by the grading of recom- mendation, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) method. However, the GRADE system does not enforce a specific method on how the panel should reach decisions during the consensus process. Our methodology committee decided to utilize the RAND appropriateness method for panel judgment and deci- sions/consensus. Results: Seventy- three proposed statements were examined and discussed in three conferences held in Bologna, Pisa, and Rome. Each conference included two rounds of face-to-face modified Delphi technique. Anonymous panel voting followed each round. The panel did not reach an agreement and therefore did not adopt any recom- mendations for six statements. Weak/ conditional recommendations were made for 2 statements, and strong recommendations were made for the remaining 65 statements. The statements were then recategorized and grouped to their current format. Internal and external peer-review processes took place before submis- sion of the recommendations. Updates will occur at least every 4 years or whenever significant major changes in evidence appear. Conclusions: This document reflects the overall results of the first consensus conference on ''point-of-care'' lung ultrasound. Statements were discussed and elaborated by experts who published the vast majority of papers on clinical use of lung ultrasound in the last 20 years. Recommendations were produced to guide implementa- tion, development, and standardization of lung ultrasound in all relevant settings.

International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound

Gargani Luna;
2012

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study is to provide evidence-based and expert consensus recommendations for lung ultrasound with focus on emergency and critical care settings. Methods: A multidisciplinary panel of 28 experts from eight countries was involved. Literature was reviewed from January 1966 to June 2011. Consensus members searched multiple databases including Pubmed, Medline, OVID, Embase, and others. The process used to develop these evidence-based recommendations involved two phases: determining the level of quality of evidence and developing the recom- mendation. The quality of evidence is assessed by the grading of recom- mendation, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) method. However, the GRADE system does not enforce a specific method on how the panel should reach decisions during the consensus process. Our methodology committee decided to utilize the RAND appropriateness method for panel judgment and deci- sions/consensus. Results: Seventy- three proposed statements were examined and discussed in three conferences held in Bologna, Pisa, and Rome. Each conference included two rounds of face-to-face modified Delphi technique. Anonymous panel voting followed each round. The panel did not reach an agreement and therefore did not adopt any recom- mendations for six statements. Weak/ conditional recommendations were made for 2 statements, and strong recommendations were made for the remaining 65 statements. The statements were then recategorized and grouped to their current format. Internal and external peer-review processes took place before submis- sion of the recommendations. Updates will occur at least every 4 years or whenever significant major changes in evidence appear. Conclusions: This document reflects the overall results of the first consensus conference on ''point-of-care'' lung ultrasound. Statements were discussed and elaborated by experts who published the vast majority of papers on clinical use of lung ultrasound in the last 20 years. Recommendations were produced to guide implementa- tion, development, and standardization of lung ultrasound in all relevant settings.
2012
Istituto di Fisiologia Clinica - IFC
Point-of-care ultrasound
Guideline
RAND
GRADE
Evidence-based medicine
Lung ultrasound
Chest sonography
Emergency ultrasound
Critical ultrasound
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
prod_325476-doc_112671.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound.
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Dimensione 291.31 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
291.31 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/321383
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2054
social impact