A peculiar feature of the Mg-Pd phase diagram is the presence of several "Complex Metal Alloys (CMAs)" which are phases with giant unit cells and inherent structural disorder; their structure can be described with Mackay clusters as fundamental structural unit [1]. These polyhedra consist in an arrangement of 52 atoms disposed in three shells with local icosahedral order: the first is an icosahedron, the second an icosidodecaedron and the third another icosahedron. The assessment of the Mg-Pd phase diagram was published in 1988 [2] with many uncertainties and subsequently, considering the existence of the CMAs, was revised by [1]. At present a definitely assessed version of the Mg-Pd phase diagram is not available, and great differences can be found for instance in the formation of the Mg6Pd phase which is indicated to be a peritectic one by [2] and having a congruent melting by [1]. As for the standard enthalpies of formation (?fH°) there is a great lack in literature for the Mg-Pd phases; nowadays predictive methods are very developed, but it is not trivial to apply common models to giant cells like those of the CMAs. Based on the phase diagram evidence of a several intermetallic compounds, the mixing behaviour of liquid Mg-Pd alloys has been analysed through the study of thermodynamic, surface and structural properties in the framework of compound formation model (CFM) and quasi chemical approximation (QCA) for regular solution.
Thermodynamic and thermophysical properties of Mg-Pd alloys: case study of Mg6Pd alloy
R Novakovic
2015
Abstract
A peculiar feature of the Mg-Pd phase diagram is the presence of several "Complex Metal Alloys (CMAs)" which are phases with giant unit cells and inherent structural disorder; their structure can be described with Mackay clusters as fundamental structural unit [1]. These polyhedra consist in an arrangement of 52 atoms disposed in three shells with local icosahedral order: the first is an icosahedron, the second an icosidodecaedron and the third another icosahedron. The assessment of the Mg-Pd phase diagram was published in 1988 [2] with many uncertainties and subsequently, considering the existence of the CMAs, was revised by [1]. At present a definitely assessed version of the Mg-Pd phase diagram is not available, and great differences can be found for instance in the formation of the Mg6Pd phase which is indicated to be a peritectic one by [2] and having a congruent melting by [1]. As for the standard enthalpies of formation (?fH°) there is a great lack in literature for the Mg-Pd phases; nowadays predictive methods are very developed, but it is not trivial to apply common models to giant cells like those of the CMAs. Based on the phase diagram evidence of a several intermetallic compounds, the mixing behaviour of liquid Mg-Pd alloys has been analysed through the study of thermodynamic, surface and structural properties in the framework of compound formation model (CFM) and quasi chemical approximation (QCA) for regular solution.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
prod_363405-doc_119796.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Descrizione: CALPHAD2015.pdf
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Dimensione
1.5 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.5 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


