The phenomenologyand reported effects of meditation vary according to the technique practiced.While numerous studies have explored the cerebral mechanisms involved inmeditation, little research provides direct comparisons between the neuronalnetwork dynamics involved in different meditation techniques. Here, we exploreand compare brain signals recorded with magnetoencephalography (MEG) during (a)resting state, (b) focused-attention meditation (FAM) and (c) open-monitoringmeditation (OMM) in a group of expert meditators (12 monks).To this end, weestimated MEG source time courses using a minimum-norm solution and computed (1)spectral power in multiple frequency bands (delta, theta, alpha, beta andgamma), (2) graph theoretical measures, (3) long-range coupling using imaginarycoherence and weighed phase-lag index and (4) multifractal scaling parameters using Wavelet Leader-based Multifractal formalism. We compared all the measures in the three conditions(OMM, FAM and resting state) and tested for statistical significance using permutationtest (paired t-test) corrected by maximum statistics. We also used a machinelearning framework in order to see which features provide the highestclassification across conditions. Our findings reveal several differencesbetween FAM, OMM and the resting-state condition. Compared to OMM, FAM isassociated with an increase in power in regions involved in attention andperformance monitoring. In OMM, increases in activity were observed in regionsinvolved in memory and emotion processing. Moreover, OMM seems to have strongestand more connections, while resting state have connections that are weaker andfewer in number compared to OMM and FAM. We discuss these results in thecontext of previous cognitive neuroimaging studies of meditation and paths forfuture research are proposed.

An MEG investigation of the brain dynamics mediating Focused-Attention andOpen-Monitoring Meditation

Annalisa Pascarella;
2016

Abstract

The phenomenologyand reported effects of meditation vary according to the technique practiced.While numerous studies have explored the cerebral mechanisms involved inmeditation, little research provides direct comparisons between the neuronalnetwork dynamics involved in different meditation techniques. Here, we exploreand compare brain signals recorded with magnetoencephalography (MEG) during (a)resting state, (b) focused-attention meditation (FAM) and (c) open-monitoringmeditation (OMM) in a group of expert meditators (12 monks).To this end, weestimated MEG source time courses using a minimum-norm solution and computed (1)spectral power in multiple frequency bands (delta, theta, alpha, beta andgamma), (2) graph theoretical measures, (3) long-range coupling using imaginarycoherence and weighed phase-lag index and (4) multifractal scaling parameters using Wavelet Leader-based Multifractal formalism. We compared all the measures in the three conditions(OMM, FAM and resting state) and tested for statistical significance using permutationtest (paired t-test) corrected by maximum statistics. We also used a machinelearning framework in order to see which features provide the highestclassification across conditions. Our findings reveal several differencesbetween FAM, OMM and the resting-state condition. Compared to OMM, FAM isassociated with an increase in power in regions involved in attention andperformance monitoring. In OMM, increases in activity were observed in regionsinvolved in memory and emotion processing. Moreover, OMM seems to have strongestand more connections, while resting state have connections that are weaker andfewer in number compared to OMM and FAM. We discuss these results in thecontext of previous cognitive neuroimaging studies of meditation and paths forfuture research are proposed.
2016
Istituto Applicazioni del Calcolo ''Mauro Picone''
meditation
meg
data analysis
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/327504
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact