Rural Development Programmes (RDPs) are a step to mainstream climate concerns in the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). National and Regional RDPs for 2014 - 2020 include instruments that promote mitigation and adaptation strategies f or agriculture to enhance biodiversity, environmental value of rural landscapes, efficient water management and the transition to a low carbon bio - based economy with reduced rates of GHG and ammonia emissions. This contribution presents a comparative assessment of actions undertaken by two EU Member states, the Netherlands (NL) and Hungary (HU) (national programmes), and two regions, Emilia Romagna (ER) and Valencia (VLC), which represent distinct agricultural and forest systems. It shows that EU regions selected for the case studies move towards mainstreaming climate concerns in Pillar II policies. In the sample, actions on ecosystems under Priority 4 ('Restoring, preserving and enhancing ecosystems') represent between 30 and 50% of the foreseen RDP expenditure for the whole period 20142020. Actions under Priority 5 ('Resource efficiency and shift to a low carbon and resilient economy') account for less than 20% of the RDP expenditure. Implementation and monitoring become key factors of success to guarantee that measures are not cosmetic and they actually influence the transition to a sustainable bioeconomy. Further efforts should contribute to progressively integrate innovative solutions in future adjustments of RDPs. Finally, further analysis of the regulatory framework, red tape, cultural change, and social innovations will be required to improve RDP effectiveness to faceclimate change challenges.

Assessing Rural Development Programs in 4 EU regions and their potential to address climate concerns

F Rossi;
2016

Abstract

Rural Development Programmes (RDPs) are a step to mainstream climate concerns in the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). National and Regional RDPs for 2014 - 2020 include instruments that promote mitigation and adaptation strategies f or agriculture to enhance biodiversity, environmental value of rural landscapes, efficient water management and the transition to a low carbon bio - based economy with reduced rates of GHG and ammonia emissions. This contribution presents a comparative assessment of actions undertaken by two EU Member states, the Netherlands (NL) and Hungary (HU) (national programmes), and two regions, Emilia Romagna (ER) and Valencia (VLC), which represent distinct agricultural and forest systems. It shows that EU regions selected for the case studies move towards mainstreaming climate concerns in Pillar II policies. In the sample, actions on ecosystems under Priority 4 ('Restoring, preserving and enhancing ecosystems') represent between 30 and 50% of the foreseen RDP expenditure for the whole period 20142020. Actions under Priority 5 ('Resource efficiency and shift to a low carbon and resilient economy') account for less than 20% of the RDP expenditure. Implementation and monitoring become key factors of success to guarantee that measures are not cosmetic and they actually influence the transition to a sustainable bioeconomy. Further efforts should contribute to progressively integrate innovative solutions in future adjustments of RDPs. Finally, further analysis of the regulatory framework, red tape, cultural change, and social innovations will be required to improve RDP effectiveness to faceclimate change challenges.
2016
Istituto di Biometeorologia - IBIMET - Sede Firenze
RDP
Climate change
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/329014
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact