Aim of the study was to assess the treatment of airway obstructive diseases in a sample of adult patients in a primary care setting in the city of Palermo, Southern Italy. Seventeen general practitioners (GPs) participated in the study performed between January and June 2014. 583 adult patients (323 males) fulfilled a respiratory questionnaire and performed a spirometry. We evaluated doctor diagnosis of: asthma (A), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ACOS) and inhaler respiratory treatment. A cut-off of FEV1/FVC < 0.70 was considered as marker of airway obstruction (AO). Subjects with A were 8%; COPD were 12; ACOS were 4%; subjects not reporting respiratory disease (NRD) were 76%. Inhaler treatment prevalence was: 56%-A; 40%-COPD; 62%-ACOS; 7%-NRD. Airway obstruction was found in 95 (16.3%) subjects: 26%-A; 30%-COPD; 43%-ACOS; 10%- NRD. Only 52% of AO subjects reported inhaler treatment: 83%-A; 69%-COPD; 67%-ACOS; 29%- NRD. Inhaler treatment prevalence was: 8%-long-acting ?2-agonist (LABA) and/or longacting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA); 33%-LAMA and/or LABA and inhaled corticosteroid (ICS); 26%-LAMA and LABA and ICS; 2%-ICS; 31%-Other. In a logistic regression model, wheezing (OR=4.50), cough (OR= 2.12), and dyspnea (OR= 2.22), were predictors of treatment in overall sample, when adjusted for age, sex and smoking habit. In AO dyspnea was the best predictor of inhaler respiratory treatment (OR= 3.61). This study points out that in a sample of adults in a primary care setting the inhaler respiratory treatment is underused with respect to diagnosis and airway obstruction. Respiratory symptoms, in particular dyspnea, seems to guide the prescription of GPs.

Inhaler treatment prescription in adults in a primary care setting

2015

Abstract

Aim of the study was to assess the treatment of airway obstructive diseases in a sample of adult patients in a primary care setting in the city of Palermo, Southern Italy. Seventeen general practitioners (GPs) participated in the study performed between January and June 2014. 583 adult patients (323 males) fulfilled a respiratory questionnaire and performed a spirometry. We evaluated doctor diagnosis of: asthma (A), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ACOS) and inhaler respiratory treatment. A cut-off of FEV1/FVC < 0.70 was considered as marker of airway obstruction (AO). Subjects with A were 8%; COPD were 12; ACOS were 4%; subjects not reporting respiratory disease (NRD) were 76%. Inhaler treatment prevalence was: 56%-A; 40%-COPD; 62%-ACOS; 7%-NRD. Airway obstruction was found in 95 (16.3%) subjects: 26%-A; 30%-COPD; 43%-ACOS; 10%- NRD. Only 52% of AO subjects reported inhaler treatment: 83%-A; 69%-COPD; 67%-ACOS; 29%- NRD. Inhaler treatment prevalence was: 8%-long-acting ?2-agonist (LABA) and/or longacting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA); 33%-LAMA and/or LABA and inhaled corticosteroid (ICS); 26%-LAMA and LABA and ICS; 2%-ICS; 31%-Other. In a logistic regression model, wheezing (OR=4.50), cough (OR= 2.12), and dyspnea (OR= 2.22), were predictors of treatment in overall sample, when adjusted for age, sex and smoking habit. In AO dyspnea was the best predictor of inhaler respiratory treatment (OR= 3.61). This study points out that in a sample of adults in a primary care setting the inhaler respiratory treatment is underused with respect to diagnosis and airway obstruction. Respiratory symptoms, in particular dyspnea, seems to guide the prescription of GPs.
2015
Istituto di biomedicina e di immunologia molecolare - IBIM - Sede Palermo
spirometry
primary care
airway management
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/339197
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact