Fast-paced innovation in the embedded systems domain puts an ever increasing pressure on effective software development methods, leading to the growing popularity of Model-Based Design (MBD). In this context, a proper choice of modeling languages and related tools-depending on design goals and problem qualities-is crucial to make the most of MBD benefits. In this paper, a comparison between two dissimilar approaches to modeling is carried out, with the goal of highlighting their relative advantages and shortcomings. It focuses on a case study involving a well-known distributed agreement protocol, a choice motivated by the fact that embedded systems are nowadays quickly evolving towards distributed, fault-tolerant architectures.

Model-based design languages: A case study

Ivan Cibrario Bertolotti;
2017

Abstract

Fast-paced innovation in the embedded systems domain puts an ever increasing pressure on effective software development methods, leading to the growing popularity of Model-Based Design (MBD). In this context, a proper choice of modeling languages and related tools-depending on design goals and problem qualities-is crucial to make the most of MBD benefits. In this paper, a comparison between two dissimilar approaches to modeling is carried out, with the goal of highlighting their relative advantages and shortcomings. It focuses on a case study involving a well-known distributed agreement protocol, a choice motivated by the fact that embedded systems are nowadays quickly evolving towards distributed, fault-tolerant architectures.
2017
Istituto di Elettronica e di Ingegneria dell'Informazione e delle Telecomunicazioni - IEIIT
Model-driven development
Distributed agreement protocols
Embedded systems design and development
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/339576
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact