Random and aligned gelatin (GL) and chitosan (CS) nano-fibres have been prepared by electrospinning tuning the collector rotation speed. The effect of fibre alignment on cell adhesion and proliferation was assessed in vitro by using different Schwann cell (SC) and neuronal models. Moreover, actin cytoskeleton organization, lamellipodia and filipodia formation, and axon outgrowth were evaluated. GL and CS fibres induced similar adhesion and proliferation rates. GL and CS random fibres promoted higher adhesion and proliferation rates induction in comparison to the aligned ones, although GL and CS fibres alignment resulted in SC and axon-oriented growth. Filipodia formation was higher on aligned fibres, suggesting that these substrates can promote higher cell migration in comparison to random ones. 50B11 (neuronal cell line) differentiation was higher on GL fibres, whereas no differences were observed in dorsal root ganglia explants model. These data suggest that both GL and CS fibres can be promising substrates to be used in peripheral nerve reconstruction. Copyright 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

In vitro evaluation of gelatin and chitosan electrospun fibres as an artificial guide in peripheral nerve repair: a comparative study.

Ciardelli G;
2018

Abstract

Random and aligned gelatin (GL) and chitosan (CS) nano-fibres have been prepared by electrospinning tuning the collector rotation speed. The effect of fibre alignment on cell adhesion and proliferation was assessed in vitro by using different Schwann cell (SC) and neuronal models. Moreover, actin cytoskeleton organization, lamellipodia and filipodia formation, and axon outgrowth were evaluated. GL and CS fibres induced similar adhesion and proliferation rates. GL and CS random fibres promoted higher adhesion and proliferation rates induction in comparison to the aligned ones, although GL and CS fibres alignment resulted in SC and axon-oriented growth. Filipodia formation was higher on aligned fibres, suggesting that these substrates can promote higher cell migration in comparison to random ones. 50B11 (neuronal cell line) differentiation was higher on GL fibres, whereas no differences were observed in dorsal root ganglia explants model. These data suggest that both GL and CS fibres can be promising substrates to be used in peripheral nerve reconstruction. Copyright 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
2018
Istituto per i Processi Chimico-Fisici - IPCF
chitosan
gelatin
electrospun fibres
peripheral nerve repair
biomimetic materials
aligned fibres
random fibres
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
prod_378685-doc_165937.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: In vitro evaluation of gelatin and chitosan electrospun fibres as an artificial guide in peripheral nerve repair: a comparative study
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Dimensione 1.25 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.25 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/340413
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 18
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact