A combination of ultraviolet and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, X-ray absorption spectroscopy, and first principle calculations was used to study the electronic structure at the interface between the strong molecular acceptor 1,3,4,5,7,8-hexafluorotetracyano-naphthoquinodimethane (F<inf>6</inf>TCNNQ) and a graphene layer supported on either a quartz or a copper substrate. We find evidence for fundamentally different charge redistribution mechanisms in the two ternary systems, as a consequence of the insulating versus metallic character of the substrates. While electron transfer occurs exclusively from graphene to F<inf>6</inf>TCNNQ on the quartz support (p-doping of graphene), the Cu substrate electron reservoir induces an additional electron density flow to graphene decorated with the acceptor monolayer. Remarkably, graphene on Cu is n-doped and remains n-doped upon F<inf>6</inf>TCNNQ deposition. On both substrates, the work function of graphene increases substantially with a F<inf>6</inf>TCNNQ monolayer atop, the effect being more pronounced (~1.3 eV) on Cu compared to quartz (~1.0 eV) because of the larger electrostatic potential drop associated with the long-distance graphene-mediated Cu-F<inf>6</inf>TCNNQ electron transfer. We thus provide a means to realize high work function surfaces for both p- and n-type doped graphene. (Graph Presented).

Tuning the Electronic Structure of Graphene by Molecular Dopants: Impact of the Substrate

Timpel M;Pasquali L;Giglia A;Nardi MV
2015

Abstract

A combination of ultraviolet and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, X-ray absorption spectroscopy, and first principle calculations was used to study the electronic structure at the interface between the strong molecular acceptor 1,3,4,5,7,8-hexafluorotetracyano-naphthoquinodimethane (F6TCNNQ) and a graphene layer supported on either a quartz or a copper substrate. We find evidence for fundamentally different charge redistribution mechanisms in the two ternary systems, as a consequence of the insulating versus metallic character of the substrates. While electron transfer occurs exclusively from graphene to F6TCNNQ on the quartz support (p-doping of graphene), the Cu substrate electron reservoir induces an additional electron density flow to graphene decorated with the acceptor monolayer. Remarkably, graphene on Cu is n-doped and remains n-doped upon F6TCNNQ deposition. On both substrates, the work function of graphene increases substantially with a F6TCNNQ monolayer atop, the effect being more pronounced (~1.3 eV) on Cu compared to quartz (~1.0 eV) because of the larger electrostatic potential drop associated with the long-distance graphene-mediated Cu-F6TCNNQ electron transfer. We thus provide a means to realize high work function surfaces for both p- and n-type doped graphene. (Graph Presented).
2015
Istituto Officina dei Materiali - IOM -
Inglese
7
34
19134
19144
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84941312775&partnerID=q2rCbXpz
doping
electrode
graphene
molecular acceptor
photoelectron spectroscopy
2
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Christodoulou C.; Giannakopoulos A.; Ligorio G.; Oehzelt M.; Timpel M.; Niederhausen J.; Pasquali L.; Giglia A.; Parvez K.; Mullen K.; Beljonne D.; Ko...espandi
01 Contributo su Rivista::01.01 Articolo in rivista
none
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/341353
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 36
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact