Following testing at the Cabauw (Netherlands) flat and inland site, and at the FINO3 offshore platform inthe North Sea (Germany), the alpha-I wind resource extrapolating method was tested at the Boulder (CO,USA) mountain site (1855 m), another substantially different location in terms of surface characteristics,stability conditions, and wind energy pattern. Data from local 82-m M2 met mast between 10 and 80mwere used, with extrapolations to 50-m and 80-m turbine hub heights performed based on 10-m and 20-m turbulence intensity observations. Trained over a 2-year period (1997-1998), the method was validatedon the year 1999.Slightly better results than those at both Cabauw and FINO3 were achieved in 50-m and 80-m windspeed extrapolations, with bias within 5%, NRMSE=0.17-0.23, and r=0.96-0.98. In predicting theannual energy yield, a bias within 1% was achieved at 50 m, which at worst increased to 6.44% at 80 m.The method was less stability-sensitive than at Cabauw and particularly FINO3. It proved to be reliableeven over a mountain site affected by fairly complex terrain, which is noteworthy if considering thepower law the method is based upon was actually developed for flat and homogeneous terrain.
Surface turbulence intensity as a predictor of extrapolated wind resource to the turbine hub height: method's test at a mountain site
Gualtieri G.
2018
Abstract
Following testing at the Cabauw (Netherlands) flat and inland site, and at the FINO3 offshore platform inthe North Sea (Germany), the alpha-I wind resource extrapolating method was tested at the Boulder (CO,USA) mountain site (1855 m), another substantially different location in terms of surface characteristics,stability conditions, and wind energy pattern. Data from local 82-m M2 met mast between 10 and 80mwere used, with extrapolations to 50-m and 80-m turbine hub heights performed based on 10-m and 20-m turbulence intensity observations. Trained over a 2-year period (1997-1998), the method was validatedon the year 1999.Slightly better results than those at both Cabauw and FINO3 were achieved in 50-m and 80-m windspeed extrapolations, with bias within 5%, NRMSE=0.17-0.23, and r=0.96-0.98. In predicting theannual energy yield, a bias within 1% was achieved at 50 m, which at worst increased to 6.44% at 80 m.The method was less stability-sensitive than at Cabauw and particularly FINO3. It proved to be reliableeven over a mountain site affected by fairly complex terrain, which is noteworthy if considering thepower law the method is based upon was actually developed for flat and homogeneous terrain.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
prod_382239-doc_129834.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Descrizione: Articolo pubblicato
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
2.16 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.16 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


