The climate research community aims to better characterize climate forcings such as aerosols, reactive gases, and greenhouse gases, and to better understand the responses of the climate system to these forcings. Such investigations rely in part on monitoring, studying, and understanding essential climate variables such as temperature, water vapor, clouds, radiation, and perturbations of aerosols and reactive gases. According to Dufresne and Bony (2008), the parameters that play a predominant role in radiative feedbacks of the climate system are atmospheric humidity, adiabatic thermal gradients, clouds, and surface albedo. Interactions between humidity, clouds, aerosols, and radiation make climate predictions more complex. The climate research community has long recognized the link between climate prediction uncertainty and atmospheric process complexity. For more than 20 years, it has demonstrated the necessity to perform collocated long-term observations of thermodynamic parameters (temperature, humidity, wind) and atmospheric constituents (gases, aerosols, clouds) distributed along the entire atmospheric column (surface to stratosphere) and associated radiative components. As a result, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) launched the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Program in the 1990s (Ackerman and Stokes 2003; Stokes 2016, chapter 2). Four atmospheric profiling observation facilities were developed to gather in situ and remote sensing instruments to monitor physical processes in the atmospheric column. A large research community of observation experts and climate modelers was funded to exploit the observation data. Similar atmospheric profiling observation facilities associated with large scientific communities emerged in Europe at the end of the 1990s. Several European initiatives were triggered or encouraged through bilateral collaborations between U.S. and European Union (EU) scientists or through participation of EU scientists in ARM projects (e.g., Cabauw observatory in the Netherlands; Palaiseau observatory in France; Jülich observatory in Germany). Atmospheric profiling observatories provide scientists with the most resolved description of the atmospheric column. In Europe, as in the United States, these observatories have been collecting data every minute daily for more than a decade, allowing links to be established between processes occurring at diurnal or finer temporal scales and phenomenon occurring at climate scales. The limitation of an atmospheric profiling observatory is that it can only document one location of the globe with its specific atmospheric properties. The aerosol distributions, meteorological anomalies, and cloud properties observed at that location are representative of a limited spatial domain. Hence, atmospheric profiling observatories are needed at many locations around the globe to cover climatically diverse areas: near coasts, in continental plains, mountains, and urban environments. The U.S. ARM Program was designed initially to cover three distinct climatic regions (Cress and Sisterson 2016, chapter 5): the Arctic (Alaska), midlatitudes [U.S. southern Great Plains (SGP)], and the tropics [tropical western Pacific (TWP) Ocean]. Atmospheric profiling observatories in Europe were developed primarily over the European continent, extending from locations around the Mediterranean Basin to the Arctic, and including coastal, continental, urban, and mountain sites. The European Commission established several funding mechanisms to develop collaborations between researchers in Europe, to promote development of harmonized research infrastructures, and to reduce fragmentation in European research investments. As a result, in the past 10 years Europe was able to build an infrastructure essential to a large community of users by harmonizing aerosol, cloud, and trace gas observations across Europe. As infrastructures, measurement techniques, data interpretation algorithms, and scientific expertise developed on both sides of the Atlantic, scientists became interested in the added benefits of collaboration and cross-fertilization between the U.S. ARM Program and EU atmospheric profiling research observatories. To expand investigations beyond existing atmospheric observatories, U.S. ARM scientists and ARM Mobile Facility (AMF) infrastructures participated in field experiments initiated by EU programs. EU and U.S. ARM scientists developed collaborations to harmonize data interpretation algorithms and to exploit jointly U.S. and EU observation datasets. Further development of formal collaboration between U.S. ARM and EU programs would enhance the ability of scientists worldwide to take on science challenges about climate change. This chapter presents several European atmospheric profiling research observatories, development of European networking, and the current European research infrastructure (section 2). Section 3 presents EU program initiatives of interest for future collaboration with the ARM Program. Section 4 highlights collaborations that were developed subsequently between the U.S. ARM Program and its European counterparts. In section 5, we present an outlook toward future U.S.-EU collaborations around climate change challenges and observations.

Parallel Developments and Formal Collaboration between European Atmospheric Profiling Observatories and the US ARM Research Program

Pappalardo G;Madonna F
2016

Abstract

The climate research community aims to better characterize climate forcings such as aerosols, reactive gases, and greenhouse gases, and to better understand the responses of the climate system to these forcings. Such investigations rely in part on monitoring, studying, and understanding essential climate variables such as temperature, water vapor, clouds, radiation, and perturbations of aerosols and reactive gases. According to Dufresne and Bony (2008), the parameters that play a predominant role in radiative feedbacks of the climate system are atmospheric humidity, adiabatic thermal gradients, clouds, and surface albedo. Interactions between humidity, clouds, aerosols, and radiation make climate predictions more complex. The climate research community has long recognized the link between climate prediction uncertainty and atmospheric process complexity. For more than 20 years, it has demonstrated the necessity to perform collocated long-term observations of thermodynamic parameters (temperature, humidity, wind) and atmospheric constituents (gases, aerosols, clouds) distributed along the entire atmospheric column (surface to stratosphere) and associated radiative components. As a result, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) launched the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Program in the 1990s (Ackerman and Stokes 2003; Stokes 2016, chapter 2). Four atmospheric profiling observation facilities were developed to gather in situ and remote sensing instruments to monitor physical processes in the atmospheric column. A large research community of observation experts and climate modelers was funded to exploit the observation data. Similar atmospheric profiling observation facilities associated with large scientific communities emerged in Europe at the end of the 1990s. Several European initiatives were triggered or encouraged through bilateral collaborations between U.S. and European Union (EU) scientists or through participation of EU scientists in ARM projects (e.g., Cabauw observatory in the Netherlands; Palaiseau observatory in France; Jülich observatory in Germany). Atmospheric profiling observatories provide scientists with the most resolved description of the atmospheric column. In Europe, as in the United States, these observatories have been collecting data every minute daily for more than a decade, allowing links to be established between processes occurring at diurnal or finer temporal scales and phenomenon occurring at climate scales. The limitation of an atmospheric profiling observatory is that it can only document one location of the globe with its specific atmospheric properties. The aerosol distributions, meteorological anomalies, and cloud properties observed at that location are representative of a limited spatial domain. Hence, atmospheric profiling observatories are needed at many locations around the globe to cover climatically diverse areas: near coasts, in continental plains, mountains, and urban environments. The U.S. ARM Program was designed initially to cover three distinct climatic regions (Cress and Sisterson 2016, chapter 5): the Arctic (Alaska), midlatitudes [U.S. southern Great Plains (SGP)], and the tropics [tropical western Pacific (TWP) Ocean]. Atmospheric profiling observatories in Europe were developed primarily over the European continent, extending from locations around the Mediterranean Basin to the Arctic, and including coastal, continental, urban, and mountain sites. The European Commission established several funding mechanisms to develop collaborations between researchers in Europe, to promote development of harmonized research infrastructures, and to reduce fragmentation in European research investments. As a result, in the past 10 years Europe was able to build an infrastructure essential to a large community of users by harmonizing aerosol, cloud, and trace gas observations across Europe. As infrastructures, measurement techniques, data interpretation algorithms, and scientific expertise developed on both sides of the Atlantic, scientists became interested in the added benefits of collaboration and cross-fertilization between the U.S. ARM Program and EU atmospheric profiling research observatories. To expand investigations beyond existing atmospheric observatories, U.S. ARM scientists and ARM Mobile Facility (AMF) infrastructures participated in field experiments initiated by EU programs. EU and U.S. ARM scientists developed collaborations to harmonize data interpretation algorithms and to exploit jointly U.S. and EU observation datasets. Further development of formal collaboration between U.S. ARM and EU programs would enhance the ability of scientists worldwide to take on science challenges about climate change. This chapter presents several European atmospheric profiling research observatories, development of European networking, and the current European research infrastructure (section 2). Section 3 presents EU program initiatives of interest for future collaboration with the ARM Program. Section 4 highlights collaborations that were developed subsequently between the U.S. ARM Program and its European counterparts. In section 5, we present an outlook toward future U.S.-EU collaborations around climate change challenges and observations.
2016
Istituto di Metodologie per l'Analisi Ambientale - IMAA
978-1-878220-84-4
EYJAFJALLAJOKULL VOLCANIC CLOUD
GROUND-BASED OBSERVATIONS
BALTEX BRIDGE CAMPAIGN
LIQUID WATER-CONTENT
MIXING-LAYER HEIGHT
LIDAR MEASUREMENTS
BOUNDARY-LAYER
RAMAN LIDAR
MICROWAVE RADIOMETER
DOPPLER LIDAR
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/342546
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact