The Conceptual representation of the "Electronic Evidence" domain presented in this chapter aims at building a common language to identifying, connecting and aligning all relevant concepts for the systematic and uniform application of new technologies in the collection, use and exchange of evidence. For setting the domain boundaries a literature review is presented along with the current standards used to define and handle Electronic Evidence. These sources of information allowed to identify a first set of terms and definitions used in the top down extraction of relevant concepts to be considered the basis for the development of the full categorization exercise. In parallel the gathered documentation was used to apply a bottom up strategy that foresees a semi-automatic extraction of lemmas and syntagms, using a natural language processing technique. The results of this activity allowed the identification of further terms and concepts to enrich the top-down extraction. The research team identified 8 classes to represent the Electronic Evidence domain: Crime, Source of Evidence, Process, Electronic Evidence, Requirement, Stakeholder, Rule, Digital Forensics. These main classes have been hierarchically structured in sub-classes, that may be easily updated and maintained. A SKOS structure, Simple Knowledge Organization System, was chosen to represent the domain. Finally considering that one of the main focuses of the EVIDENCE Project concerns the development of a framework for data exchange between judicial actors and LEAs, the study has taken into account the exchange of both digital born evidence and of not digital born one.

The conceptual representation of the Electronic Evidence domain

Avveduto S;Luzi D;Conti S;L Pisacane
2018

Abstract

The Conceptual representation of the "Electronic Evidence" domain presented in this chapter aims at building a common language to identifying, connecting and aligning all relevant concepts for the systematic and uniform application of new technologies in the collection, use and exchange of evidence. For setting the domain boundaries a literature review is presented along with the current standards used to define and handle Electronic Evidence. These sources of information allowed to identify a first set of terms and definitions used in the top down extraction of relevant concepts to be considered the basis for the development of the full categorization exercise. In parallel the gathered documentation was used to apply a bottom up strategy that foresees a semi-automatic extraction of lemmas and syntagms, using a natural language processing technique. The results of this activity allowed the identification of further terms and concepts to enrich the top-down extraction. The research team identified 8 classes to represent the Electronic Evidence domain: Crime, Source of Evidence, Process, Electronic Evidence, Requirement, Stakeholder, Rule, Digital Forensics. These main classes have been hierarchically structured in sub-classes, that may be easily updated and maintained. A SKOS structure, Simple Knowledge Organization System, was chosen to represent the domain. Finally considering that one of the main focuses of the EVIDENCE Project concerns the development of a framework for data exchange between judicial actors and LEAs, the study has taken into account the exchange of both digital born evidence and of not digital born one.
2018
Istituto di Ricerche sulla Popolazione e le Politiche Sociali - IRPPS
Istituto di Informatica Giuridica e Sistemi Giudiziari - IGSG
978-3-319-74872-6
ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE
Prova digitale
Digital evidence
informatica forense
scambio prova digitale
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
prod_385798-doc_170613.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: The Conceptual Representation of the "Electronic Evidence" Domain
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Dimensione 1.12 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.12 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/343043
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact