The rapid dissolution of copper oxide (CuO) nanoparticles (NPs) with release of ions is thought to be one of the main factors modulating their toxicity. Here we assessed the cytotoxicity of a panel of CuO NPs (12 nm +/- 4 nm) with different surface modifications, i.e., anionic sodium citrate (CIT) and sodium ascorbate (ASC), neutral polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), and cationic polyethylenimine (PEI), versus the pristine (uncoated) NPs, using a murine macrophage cell line (RAW264.7). Cytotoxicity, reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, and cellular uptake were assessed. The cytotoxicity results were analyzed by the benchmark dose (BMD) method and the NPs were ranked based on BMD20 values. The PEI-coated NPs were found to be the most cytotoxic. Despite the different properties of the coating agents, NP dissolution in cell medium was only marginally affected by surface modification. Furthermore, CuCl2 (used as an ion control) elicited significantly less cytotoxicity when compared to the CuO NPs. We also observed that the antioxidant, N-acetylcysteine, failed to protect against the cytotoxicity of the uncoated CuO NPs. Indeed, the toxicity of the surface-modified CuO NPs was not directly linked to particle dissolution and subsequent Cu burden in cells, nor to cellular ROS production, although CuO-ASC NPs, which were found to be the least cytotoxic, yielded lower levels of ROS in comparison to pristine NPs. Hierarchical cluster analysis suggested, instead, that the toxicity in the current in vitro model could be explained by synergistic interactions between the NPs, their dissolution, and the toxicity of the coating agents. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Toxicity of surface-modified copper oxide nanoparticles in a mouse macrophage cell line: Interplay of particles, surface coating and particle dissolution

Ortelli Simona;Blosi Magda;Costa Anna L;
2018

Abstract

The rapid dissolution of copper oxide (CuO) nanoparticles (NPs) with release of ions is thought to be one of the main factors modulating their toxicity. Here we assessed the cytotoxicity of a panel of CuO NPs (12 nm +/- 4 nm) with different surface modifications, i.e., anionic sodium citrate (CIT) and sodium ascorbate (ASC), neutral polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), and cationic polyethylenimine (PEI), versus the pristine (uncoated) NPs, using a murine macrophage cell line (RAW264.7). Cytotoxicity, reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, and cellular uptake were assessed. The cytotoxicity results were analyzed by the benchmark dose (BMD) method and the NPs were ranked based on BMD20 values. The PEI-coated NPs were found to be the most cytotoxic. Despite the different properties of the coating agents, NP dissolution in cell medium was only marginally affected by surface modification. Furthermore, CuCl2 (used as an ion control) elicited significantly less cytotoxicity when compared to the CuO NPs. We also observed that the antioxidant, N-acetylcysteine, failed to protect against the cytotoxicity of the uncoated CuO NPs. Indeed, the toxicity of the surface-modified CuO NPs was not directly linked to particle dissolution and subsequent Cu burden in cells, nor to cellular ROS production, although CuO-ASC NPs, which were found to be the least cytotoxic, yielded lower levels of ROS in comparison to pristine NPs. Hierarchical cluster analysis suggested, instead, that the toxicity in the current in vitro model could be explained by synergistic interactions between the NPs, their dissolution, and the toxicity of the coating agents. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
2018
Istituto di Scienza, Tecnologia e Sostenibilità per lo Sviluppo dei Materiali Ceramici - ISSMC (ex ISTEC)
Nanoparticles
Surface coating
Cytotoxicity
Macrophages
Oxidative stress
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/343363
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 37
social impact