Objective: There is controversy about the diagnostic criteria, prevalence, symptoms, and spirometry characteristics of asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) overlap (ACO). Recent data indicate that the fixed method for diagnosing airway obstruction (AO) may overestimate ACO prevalence in the elderly, and a variable method may be more accurate. We aimed at estimating ACO prevalence in a general population sample and comparing patient and clinical features in subjects with ACO, COPD, and asthma. Methods: We analyzed data from a cross-sectional study estimating COPD prevalence in randomly selected adults aged 20-79 years in Verona, Italy, and estimated prevalence and analyzed characteristics of asthma, COPD, and ACO. ACO was defined as AO (Forced Expiratory Volume in one second-FEV1/ Forced Vital Capacity-FVC < Lower Limit of Normal-LLN), highly positive bronchodilator test (15% increase in FEV1 and FVC 400 mL), and personal self-reported history of physician diagnosed asthma and atopy. Results: One thousand two hundred and thirty-six patients were included; 207 (16.7%) had asthma, COPD, or ACO (mean ages: 61.2, 59.7, and 57.2 years, respectively). The 3 groups had similar clinical and demographic variables; however, spirometry revealed differences between ACO and COPD patients, particularly post-bronchodilator FEV1 reversibility, which was detected in ACO and asthma patients but not in those with COPD. Conclusion: ACO prevalence in Northern Italy was estimated at 2.1%, in the range of values reported by previous studies. Marked differences between ACO and COPD revealed by spirometry may have important clinical implications in terms of treatment for patients with ACO.

Prevalence and features of asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Giovanni Viegi;
2019

Abstract

Objective: There is controversy about the diagnostic criteria, prevalence, symptoms, and spirometry characteristics of asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) overlap (ACO). Recent data indicate that the fixed method for diagnosing airway obstruction (AO) may overestimate ACO prevalence in the elderly, and a variable method may be more accurate. We aimed at estimating ACO prevalence in a general population sample and comparing patient and clinical features in subjects with ACO, COPD, and asthma. Methods: We analyzed data from a cross-sectional study estimating COPD prevalence in randomly selected adults aged 20-79 years in Verona, Italy, and estimated prevalence and analyzed characteristics of asthma, COPD, and ACO. ACO was defined as AO (Forced Expiratory Volume in one second-FEV1/ Forced Vital Capacity-FVC < Lower Limit of Normal-LLN), highly positive bronchodilator test (15% increase in FEV1 and FVC 400 mL), and personal self-reported history of physician diagnosed asthma and atopy. Results: One thousand two hundred and thirty-six patients were included; 207 (16.7%) had asthma, COPD, or ACO (mean ages: 61.2, 59.7, and 57.2 years, respectively). The 3 groups had similar clinical and demographic variables; however, spirometry revealed differences between ACO and COPD patients, particularly post-bronchodilator FEV1 reversibility, which was detected in ACO and asthma patients but not in those with COPD. Conclusion: ACO prevalence in Northern Italy was estimated at 2.1%, in the range of values reported by previous studies. Marked differences between ACO and COPD revealed by spirometry may have important clinical implications in terms of treatment for patients with ACO.
2019
Istituto di biomedicina e di immunologia molecolare - IBIM - Sede Palermo
Istituto di Fisiologia Clinica - IFC
asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap syundrome
clinical characteristics
diagnostic criteria
prevalence
spirometry
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
prod_384089-doc_131076.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: Prevalence and features of asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Dimensione 418 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
418 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/343954
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 14
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact