Rehashing bushmeat - interview campaigns reveal some controversial issues about the bushmeat trade dynamics in Nigeria

Using questionnaire surveys in southern Nigeria, this paper explores whether: (i) bushmeat is still a crucial source of animal protein for local communities; (ii) is still culturally very relevant; and (iii) if people value differently the various kinds of bushmeat species because of customer preferences. In addition, this paper provides information on whether (iv) the bushmeat trade locally depletes target game species; and (v) whether the disappearance of large animals from the markets would indicate their local extirpation from the wild. A combination of interviews was carried out with both men and women of different age classes including hunters, consumers and sellers, from different Nigerian locations with different habitat conditions, socio-economic and ethnic characteristics. Results of these interviews suggest that the consumption of bushmeat has little subsistence value, especially in urban areas, except for a small sub-section of the community. Indeed, even in rural areas less than 30 % of the interviewees of less than 50 years age answered that they frequently eat bushmeat. Cultural importance of bushmeat decreased substantially in recent years, as shown by that (i) this food source was quickly abandoned by people during the 2014 Ebola crisis, and (ii) most of questionnaire respondents affirmed that they would have eaten bushmeat only rarely or even not at all. There was support for the notion that the price of a carcass was mainly determined by the animal size and not by the consumer preference. Bushmeat utilization and trade may certainly deplete target animal species at the local scale. Nonetheless, there is still no sufficient empirical evidence for the notion that, when large animals disappeared from the markets, it meant that their populations were heavily depleted or even extinct. Indeed, based on cultural elements highlighted by interviewed hunters, there is evidence that this notion may be wrong, at least in the richest and economically more dynamic regions of West Africa. It is advised that bushmeat studies should explore more in depth the cultural flexibility of human communities before drawing generalized conclusions, thus avoiding unsupported large-scale conclusions based on data collected at a very small spatial scale and during short time periods.