The paper proposes a geostatistical framework to solve the issues of heterogeneous support for spatial estimation. Apparent soil electrical conductivity (ECa) was measured in a field cropped with San Marzano tomato using a multiple frequency electromagnetic profiler with six operating frequencies. Mixed support kriging (MSK) was used to estimate ECa taking into account the change of support. The method includes punctual kriging with the error being the dispersion variance associated with each frequency. The mixed support kriging approach was compared with traditional block cokriging (BCOK) through cross validation. Block cokriging compared to MSK was more computationally intensive to fit the multivariate model of spatial dependence, and in estimating ECa, mixed support kriging outperformed at some frequencies whereas BCOK was more accurate at others. The two approaches were also compared in terms of field-delineation which differed in spatial continuity.

A comparison between mixed support kriging and block cokriging for modelling and combining spatial data with different support

Buttafuoco G.
2019

Abstract

The paper proposes a geostatistical framework to solve the issues of heterogeneous support for spatial estimation. Apparent soil electrical conductivity (ECa) was measured in a field cropped with San Marzano tomato using a multiple frequency electromagnetic profiler with six operating frequencies. Mixed support kriging (MSK) was used to estimate ECa taking into account the change of support. The method includes punctual kriging with the error being the dispersion variance associated with each frequency. The mixed support kriging approach was compared with traditional block cokriging (BCOK) through cross validation. Block cokriging compared to MSK was more computationally intensive to fit the multivariate model of spatial dependence, and in estimating ECa, mixed support kriging outperformed at some frequencies whereas BCOK was more accurate at others. The two approaches were also compared in terms of field-delineation which differed in spatial continuity.
2019
Istituto per i Sistemi Agricoli e Forestali del Mediterraneo - ISAFOM
Precision Agriculture
GEM300
data fusion
change of support
field delineation
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
s11119-018-09630-w.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: A comparison between mixed support kriging and block cokriging for modelling and combining spatial data with different support
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 2.83 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.83 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/355752
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact