In a cross-border dimension considering the specific collaboration among European Union Member States related to criminal investigations and criminal trials, it becomes crucial to have a common and shared understanding of what Electronic Evidence is and how it should be treated in the EU context and in the EU MS. In this context the EVIDENCE project developed a tailor-made categorization of relevant concepts that allow to rely on a common and shared knowledge in this domain. The categorization provides a starting analysis for the exchange of Electronic Evidence and data between judicial actors and LEAs, with a specific focus on issues of the criminal field and criminal procedures. This semantic Structure might represent a good starting point for the alignment of electronic evidence concepts all over Europe in across border dimension. This categorisation is significant as it is one of the few initiatives to identify and classify relevant concepts in a domain, which currently lacks of clear boundaries and touches upon different disciplines.

Electronic Evidence Semantic Structure: Exchanging Evidence Across Europe in a Coherent and Consistent Way

Biasiotti MA;Conti S;Turchi F
2018

Abstract

In a cross-border dimension considering the specific collaboration among European Union Member States related to criminal investigations and criminal trials, it becomes crucial to have a common and shared understanding of what Electronic Evidence is and how it should be treated in the EU context and in the EU MS. In this context the EVIDENCE project developed a tailor-made categorization of relevant concepts that allow to rely on a common and shared knowledge in this domain. The categorization provides a starting analysis for the exchange of Electronic Evidence and data between judicial actors and LEAs, with a specific focus on issues of the criminal field and criminal procedures. This semantic Structure might represent a good starting point for the alignment of electronic evidence concepts all over Europe in across border dimension. This categorisation is significant as it is one of the few initiatives to identify and classify relevant concepts in a domain, which currently lacks of clear boundaries and touches upon different disciplines.
2018
Inglese
Ugo Pagallo Monica Palmirani Pompeu Casanovas Giovanni Sartor Serena Villata
AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems
AICOL 2015, AICOL 2016, AICOL 2016, AICOL 2017, AICOL 2017
10791
556
573
http://www.scopus.com/record/display.url?eid=2-s2.0-85064455356&origin=inward
Springer-Verlag Berlin
Berlin
GERMANIA
Sì, ma tipo non specificato
2015-2017
electronic evidence
european judicial cooperation
semantic access to knowledge
3
none
Biasiotti M.A.; Conti S.; Turchi F.
273
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
04 Contributo in convegno::04.01 Contributo in Atti di convegno
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/361003
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact