Some of the most widely used thermospheric density models (JR-71, MSIS-86, MSISE-90, TD-88) were compared, by analyzing the decay histories of nine satellites. The satellite sample and the time interval examined encompassed a broad range of altitudes (200-1500 km) and solar activity levels (1987-1999). The MSIS models, practically identical above 200 km, resulted to be the best ones to compute air density below 400 km, in low solar activity conditions. JR-71 seemed to be more accurate at greater altitudes and/or solar fluxes. TD-88 gave quite mixed performances, but generally closer to the JR-71 results. The intrinsic accuracy of JR-71, MSIS-86 and MSISE-90 was generally better than 20%, and sometimes close to 10%. This picture resulted progressively degraded at altitudes greater than 400 km.

Comparison of thermospheric density models by satellite orbital decay analysis

Pardini C;Anselmo L
2000

Abstract

Some of the most widely used thermospheric density models (JR-71, MSIS-86, MSISE-90, TD-88) were compared, by analyzing the decay histories of nine satellites. The satellite sample and the time interval examined encompassed a broad range of altitudes (200-1500 km) and solar activity levels (1987-1999). The MSIS models, practically identical above 200 km, resulted to be the best ones to compute air density below 400 km, in low solar activity conditions. JR-71 seemed to be more accurate at greater altitudes and/or solar fluxes. TD-88 gave quite mixed performances, but generally closer to the JR-71 results. The intrinsic accuracy of JR-71, MSIS-86 and MSISE-90 was generally better than 20%, and sometimes close to 10%. This picture resulted progressively degraded at altitudes greater than 400 km.
2000
Istituto di Scienza e Tecnologie dell'Informazione "Alessandro Faedo" - ISTI
Orbital decay
Physical sciences and engineering
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
prod_406784-doc_142377.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Comparison of thermospheric density models by satellite orbital decay analysis
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Dimensione 114.13 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
114.13 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/368422
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact