The ability of a system to absorb, recover from and successfully adapt to stressing circumstances can be defined as "resilience". To make cities more resilient toward natural disasters, several international initiatives recommend to consider the risk management not only in emergency conditions. The identification of characteristics that make resilient the cities toward natural disasters and the connection between the resilience goals and the risk management phases (mitigation, preparedness, response, recovery) are the main purposes of the framework implemented in the present work. At this aim, we considered the city as complex, dynamic, self-organizing system, continuously changing under the pressure of perturbing internal or external factors. The framework, structured in a Geographic Information System, is useful at different territorial management scales and can host many types of data. Starting from a critical review of international frameworks, focused on the resilience, four drivers (economic, social, environmental and institutional), several driver descriptors (number: 15) and sub-drivers (number: 36) were identified to improve the resilience and to manage the territory during the risk management phases. This frame allows to overcome the sectorial approaches of territorial management promoting the integration of resilience goals (prevent, prepare for, cope with, respond to, and recover from) and of risk management phases (mitigation, preparedness, response, recovery) into ordinary planning tools.

An evaluation framework for resilience-oriented planning

Gabriella Esposito De Vita;Roberta Iavarone;Antonia Gravagnuolo;Ines Alberico
2019

Abstract

The ability of a system to absorb, recover from and successfully adapt to stressing circumstances can be defined as "resilience". To make cities more resilient toward natural disasters, several international initiatives recommend to consider the risk management not only in emergency conditions. The identification of characteristics that make resilient the cities toward natural disasters and the connection between the resilience goals and the risk management phases (mitigation, preparedness, response, recovery) are the main purposes of the framework implemented in the present work. At this aim, we considered the city as complex, dynamic, self-organizing system, continuously changing under the pressure of perturbing internal or external factors. The framework, structured in a Geographic Information System, is useful at different territorial management scales and can host many types of data. Starting from a critical review of international frameworks, focused on the resilience, four drivers (economic, social, environmental and institutional), several driver descriptors (number: 15) and sub-drivers (number: 36) were identified to improve the resilience and to manage the territory during the risk management phases. This frame allows to overcome the sectorial approaches of territorial management promoting the integration of resilience goals (prevent, prepare for, cope with, respond to, and recover from) and of risk management phases (mitigation, preparedness, response, recovery) into ordinary planning tools.
2019
Istituto di Ricerca su Innovazione e Servizi per lo Sviluppo - IRISS
Istituto di Scienze Marine - ISMAR
urban resilience
urban regeneration
risk management
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
prod_389009-doc_159498.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: evaluation framework
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 104.5 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
104.5 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/369525
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact