In this paper, the output tracking problem for linear and nonlinear systems in normal form is revisited in the case of non-minimum phase dynamics and in the absence of any model for the exosystem generating the periodic reference signal. The asymptotic output tracking is obtained by replacing the classical stability condition for the zero dynamics driven by the reference signal with the existence of a solution to a two-point boundary value problem. The latter solution allows to generate the ideal steady-state evolution of the zero dynamics. This strategy allows to retain two interesting features of standard tracking and regulation approaches, namely, i) the use of a simple linear feedback structure and without the need of solving any partial differential equation (as in tracking) and ii) avoiding minimum phase requirements (as in output regulation). Since the same kind of two-point boundary value problem usually arises in the application of the Pontryagin Minimum Principle in optimal control, a natural question to ask is whether there is an underlying connection; hence, in the linear case, further insights are achieved by comparison with an alternative solution based on optimal control problem formulated for an auxiliary affine system.

Asymptotic tracking for linear and nonlinear systems: A two-point boundary value formulation

Possieri Corrado;
2019

Abstract

In this paper, the output tracking problem for linear and nonlinear systems in normal form is revisited in the case of non-minimum phase dynamics and in the absence of any model for the exosystem generating the periodic reference signal. The asymptotic output tracking is obtained by replacing the classical stability condition for the zero dynamics driven by the reference signal with the existence of a solution to a two-point boundary value problem. The latter solution allows to generate the ideal steady-state evolution of the zero dynamics. This strategy allows to retain two interesting features of standard tracking and regulation approaches, namely, i) the use of a simple linear feedback structure and without the need of solving any partial differential equation (as in tracking) and ii) avoiding minimum phase requirements (as in output regulation). Since the same kind of two-point boundary value problem usually arises in the application of the Pontryagin Minimum Principle in optimal control, a natural question to ask is whether there is an underlying connection; hence, in the linear case, further insights are achieved by comparison with an alternative solution based on optimal control problem formulated for an auxiliary affine system.
2019
Istituto di Analisi dei Sistemi ed Informatica ''Antonio Ruberti'' - IASI
Inglese
8th IFAC Symposium on Mechatronic Systems held jointly with the 11th IFAC Symposium on Nonlinear Control Systems
52
598
603
http://www.scopus.com/record/display.url?eid=2-s2.0-85077430927&origin=inward
4-6/9/2019
Vienna, Austria
Non-minimum phase systems
Output tracking
Periodic optimal control
1
none
Galeani, Sergio; Possieri, Corrado; Sassano, Mario
273
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
04 Contributo in convegno::04.01 Contributo in Atti di convegno
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/369813
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact