Measuring marine biodiversity is essential to proper management of biological resources. Monitoring networks and observatory systems are adopting conceptual frameworks to agree on the fundamental variables describing the biodiversity change and to meaningfully inform policy makers. Biological and ecosystem Essential Ocean Variables (bio-eco EOVs) and Essential Biodiversity Variables (EBVs) both help to harmonize observations of different providers to essential measurements.Conceptual relationships between the two frameworks have been recently outlined to enrich data with complementary information. However, even if bio-eco EOVs and EBVs are adopted among research communities, they represent theoretical approaches whose implementations are often limited and still uncoupled. To evaluate operative reuse of biodiversity measurements, in this paper we identify differences and common aspects between the management recommendations established by the two frameworks in a synoptic comparison. Also, we provide evidences for applying the proposed approach to the marine component of the Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) networks, by individuating in the Italian network (LTER-Italy) the Northern Adriatic Sea as a case study where compare, in further work, the data handling practices with the identified recommendations.

Making data management practices compliant with Essential Variables frameworks: A practical approach in the marine biological domain

Martina Zilioli;Alessandro Oggioni;Paolo Tagliolato;Cristiano Fugazza;Caterina Bergami;Alessandra Pugnetti;Paola Carrara
2019

Abstract

Measuring marine biodiversity is essential to proper management of biological resources. Monitoring networks and observatory systems are adopting conceptual frameworks to agree on the fundamental variables describing the biodiversity change and to meaningfully inform policy makers. Biological and ecosystem Essential Ocean Variables (bio-eco EOVs) and Essential Biodiversity Variables (EBVs) both help to harmonize observations of different providers to essential measurements.Conceptual relationships between the two frameworks have been recently outlined to enrich data with complementary information. However, even if bio-eco EOVs and EBVs are adopted among research communities, they represent theoretical approaches whose implementations are often limited and still uncoupled. To evaluate operative reuse of biodiversity measurements, in this paper we identify differences and common aspects between the management recommendations established by the two frameworks in a synoptic comparison. Also, we provide evidences for applying the proposed approach to the marine component of the Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) networks, by individuating in the Italian network (LTER-Italy) the Northern Adriatic Sea as a case study where compare, in further work, the data handling practices with the identified recommendations.
2019
Istituto per il Rilevamento Elettromagnetico dell'Ambiente - IREA
Istituto di Scienze Marine - ISMAR
978-92-990084-2-3
Essential Variables
Marine observation
long-term
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
prod_417759-doc_147384.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: Ziliolietal_2019_MetroSea
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 460.83 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
460.83 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/370346
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact