In the digital age, classical philology is becoming more and more collaborative and cooperative. Even if these terms are apparently synonyms, the distinction adopted by pedagogues in the last decades is useful to describe different ways to organise collective works. Collaboration aims at the realisation of a final product, which is the result of negotiations among the involved parts. Cooperation aims at the creation of independent subproducts, which will be coordinated to achieve the agreed final result, but which can also be assembled in unpredictable new ways by third parties. In order to integrate these approaches in the domain of classical philology, first of all it is necessary to clarify the needs of a typical philologist, not just the requirements of the user of a specific project. For this reason, the last part of the article is devoted to a case study that takes into account the exploration of the secondary literature, often neglected by digital philologists but crucial to the ecdotic best practices.
Alcune note di ecdotica digitale nella prospettiva della filologia collaborativa e cooperativa
Federico Boschetti
2017
Abstract
In the digital age, classical philology is becoming more and more collaborative and cooperative. Even if these terms are apparently synonyms, the distinction adopted by pedagogues in the last decades is useful to describe different ways to organise collective works. Collaboration aims at the realisation of a final product, which is the result of negotiations among the involved parts. Cooperation aims at the creation of independent subproducts, which will be coordinated to achieve the agreed final result, but which can also be assembled in unpredictable new ways by third parties. In order to integrate these approaches in the domain of classical philology, first of all it is necessary to clarify the needs of a typical philologist, not just the requirements of the user of a specific project. For this reason, the last part of the article is devoted to a case study that takes into account the exploration of the secondary literature, often neglected by digital philologists but crucial to the ecdotic best practices.| Campo DC | Valore | Lingua |
|---|---|---|
| dc.authority.people | Federico Boschetti | it |
| dc.collection.id.s | 8c50ea44-be95-498f-946e-7bb5bd666b7c | * |
| dc.collection.name | 02.01 Contributo in volume (Capitolo o Saggio) | * |
| dc.contributor.appartenenza | Istituto di linguistica computazionale "Antonio Zampolli" - ILC | * |
| dc.contributor.appartenenza.mi | 918 | * |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024/02/18 16:41:41 | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024/02/18 16:41:41 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | - |
| dc.description.abstracteng | In the digital age, classical philology is becoming more and more collaborative and cooperative. Even if these terms are apparently synonyms, the distinction adopted by pedagogues in the last decades is useful to describe different ways to organise collective works. Collaboration aims at the realisation of a final product, which is the result of negotiations among the involved parts. Cooperation aims at the creation of independent subproducts, which will be coordinated to achieve the agreed final result, but which can also be assembled in unpredictable new ways by third parties. In order to integrate these approaches in the domain of classical philology, first of all it is necessary to clarify the needs of a typical philologist, not just the requirements of the user of a specific project. For this reason, the last part of the article is devoted to a case study that takes into account the exploration of the secondary literature, often neglected by digital philologists but crucial to the ecdotic best practices. | - |
| dc.description.affiliations | CNR-ILC | - |
| dc.description.allpeople | Federico Boschetti | - |
| dc.description.allpeopleoriginal | Federico Boschetti | - |
| dc.description.fulltext | none | en |
| dc.description.numberofauthors | 1 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.14277/978-88-6969-182-9/ANT_14 | - |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 9788869691836 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/381122 | - |
| dc.language.iso | ita | - |
| dc.publisher.country | ITA | - |
| dc.publisher.name | Edizioni Ca' Foscari | - |
| dc.publisher.place | Venezia | - |
| dc.relation.alleditors | Paolo Mastandrea | - |
| dc.relation.firstpage | 61 | - |
| dc.relation.ispartofbook | Strumenti digitali e collaborativi per le scienze dell'antichità | - |
| dc.relation.lastpage | 67 | - |
| dc.subject.keywords | ecdotica digitale | - |
| dc.subject.singlekeyword | ecdotica digitale | * |
| dc.title | Alcune note di ecdotica digitale nella prospettiva della filologia collaborativa e cooperativa | en |
| dc.type.driver | info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart | - |
| dc.type.full | 02 Contributo in Volume::02.01 Contributo in volume (Capitolo o Saggio) | it |
| dc.type.miur | 268 | - |
| dc.type.referee | Sì, ma tipo non specificato | - |
| dc.ugov.descaux1 | 431170 | - |
| iris.orcid.lastModifiedDate | 2024/03/02 05:16:32 | * |
| iris.orcid.lastModifiedMillisecond | 1709352992364 | * |
| iris.sitodocente.maxattempts | 1 | - |
| iris.unpaywall.metadataCallLastModified | 22/12/2024 14:14:47 | - |
| iris.unpaywall.metadataCallLastModifiedMillisecond | 1734873287966 | - |
| iris.unpaywall.metadataErrorDescription | 0 | - |
| iris.unpaywall.metadataErrorType | ERROR_NO_MATCH | - |
| iris.unpaywall.metadataStatus | ERROR | - |
| Appare nelle tipologie: | 02.01 Contributo in volume (Capitolo o Saggio) | |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


