This white paper has been elaborated by the Tools (R&D) Working Group, one of the 7 Working Groups launched by the OPERAS research infrastructure. The Working Group goal was to set up a list of tools and development which need to be done, to improve their usability for the OPERAS partners. The approach in OPERAS emphasizes the importance of building the open science scholarly communication infrastructure in Social Sciences and Humanities on community driven tools. In this perspective, the development of Open Source tools and the setup of a toolbox appear to be appropriate answers to the existing needs and evolutions in scholarly publishing. Following a first discussion in the Working Group, participants discussed the partners' practices and needs to help focus the Working Group objectives on three functions: -- Peer review: interest in emerging practices such as open peer review, peer review tracking -- Authoring: interest in simple and all-in-one services, especially online and collaborative authoring -- Publishing: in particular, simple tools needed by small academic journals The main results of the Working Group are: -- Notes on observed trends -- A common approach and criteria for choosing tools -- A list of relevant tools, detailing features and functionalities -- An analysis of the current needs of the partners For Peer Review, the reviewing workflow is implemented in most Open Source software like Open Journal System (OJS) but developments are still needed to match the commercial software services. Similarly, the review tracking data available via services such as Publons is currently not open. The emerging trend for Open Peer Review represents an innovative area, both in terms of usage and tools. For Authoring, we see a bloom of new online and collaborative tools. Promising Open Source software for editing structured scholarly content are being developed and are near to production, alongside commercial tools such as Authorea or Overleaf. One of the main challenges, in this case, is to obtain a continuous production environment through interoperability. For Publishing, several Open Source software solutions are already used in production, but, as the level of service expected from a publication service is rising and includes a growing number of thirdparty services, the community is considering ways of working together to combine their effort to be comparable with the state of the art of the commercial solutions. The Operas partners are willing to go beyond this working group and consider engaging in follow-up projects, notably to help create a resource centre dedicated to providing the community with current information and support on scholarly communication software and tools, and to contribute to the effort in developing Open Source tools.

OPERAS Tools Research and Development White Paper

Di Donato F;
2018

Abstract

This white paper has been elaborated by the Tools (R&D) Working Group, one of the 7 Working Groups launched by the OPERAS research infrastructure. The Working Group goal was to set up a list of tools and development which need to be done, to improve their usability for the OPERAS partners. The approach in OPERAS emphasizes the importance of building the open science scholarly communication infrastructure in Social Sciences and Humanities on community driven tools. In this perspective, the development of Open Source tools and the setup of a toolbox appear to be appropriate answers to the existing needs and evolutions in scholarly publishing. Following a first discussion in the Working Group, participants discussed the partners' practices and needs to help focus the Working Group objectives on three functions: -- Peer review: interest in emerging practices such as open peer review, peer review tracking -- Authoring: interest in simple and all-in-one services, especially online and collaborative authoring -- Publishing: in particular, simple tools needed by small academic journals The main results of the Working Group are: -- Notes on observed trends -- A common approach and criteria for choosing tools -- A list of relevant tools, detailing features and functionalities -- An analysis of the current needs of the partners For Peer Review, the reviewing workflow is implemented in most Open Source software like Open Journal System (OJS) but developments are still needed to match the commercial software services. Similarly, the review tracking data available via services such as Publons is currently not open. The emerging trend for Open Peer Review represents an innovative area, both in terms of usage and tools. For Authoring, we see a bloom of new online and collaborative tools. Promising Open Source software for editing structured scholarly content are being developed and are near to production, alongside commercial tools such as Authorea or Overleaf. One of the main challenges, in this case, is to obtain a continuous production environment through interoperability. For Publishing, several Open Source software solutions are already used in production, but, as the level of service expected from a publication service is rising and includes a growing number of thirdparty services, the community is considering ways of working together to combine their effort to be comparable with the state of the art of the commercial solutions. The Operas partners are willing to go beyond this working group and consider engaging in follow-up projects, notably to help create a resource centre dedicated to providing the community with current information and support on scholarly communication software and tools, and to contribute to the effort in developing Open Source tools.
Campo DC Valore Lingua
dc.authority.people Gingold A it
dc.authority.people Di Donato F it
dc.authority.people Gendre P it
dc.authority.people Giglia E it
dc.authority.people Maryl M it
dc.authority.people Mowlam T it
dc.authority.people Sillaume G it
dc.authority.people Staines H it
dc.authority.people Wennström S it
dc.collection.id.s 0a8868f5-ed00-4649-854b-d9a6fd0a38b2 *
dc.collection.name 08.01 Rapporto di progetto *
dc.contributor.appartenenza Istituto di linguistica computazionale "Antonio Zampolli" - ILC *
dc.contributor.appartenenza.mi 918 *
dc.date.accessioned 2024/02/18 18:01:43 -
dc.date.available 2024/02/18 18:01:43 -
dc.date.issued 2018 -
dc.description.abstracteng This white paper has been elaborated by the Tools (R&D) Working Group, one of the 7 Working Groups launched by the OPERAS research infrastructure. The Working Group goal was to set up a list of tools and development which need to be done, to improve their usability for the OPERAS partners. The approach in OPERAS emphasizes the importance of building the open science scholarly communication infrastructure in Social Sciences and Humanities on community driven tools. In this perspective, the development of Open Source tools and the setup of a toolbox appear to be appropriate answers to the existing needs and evolutions in scholarly publishing. Following a first discussion in the Working Group, participants discussed the partners' practices and needs to help focus the Working Group objectives on three functions: -- Peer review: interest in emerging practices such as open peer review, peer review tracking -- Authoring: interest in simple and all-in-one services, especially online and collaborative authoring -- Publishing: in particular, simple tools needed by small academic journals The main results of the Working Group are: -- Notes on observed trends -- A common approach and criteria for choosing tools -- A list of relevant tools, detailing features and functionalities -- An analysis of the current needs of the partners For Peer Review, the reviewing workflow is implemented in most Open Source software like Open Journal System (OJS) but developments are still needed to match the commercial software services. Similarly, the review tracking data available via services such as Publons is currently not open. The emerging trend for Open Peer Review represents an innovative area, both in terms of usage and tools. For Authoring, we see a bloom of new online and collaborative tools. Promising Open Source software for editing structured scholarly content are being developed and are near to production, alongside commercial tools such as Authorea or Overleaf. One of the main challenges, in this case, is to obtain a continuous production environment through interoperability. For Publishing, several Open Source software solutions are already used in production, but, as the level of service expected from a publication service is rising and includes a growing number of thirdparty services, the community is considering ways of working together to combine their effort to be comparable with the state of the art of the commercial solutions. The Operas partners are willing to go beyond this working group and consider engaging in follow-up projects, notably to help create a resource centre dedicated to providing the community with current information and support on scholarly communication software and tools, and to contribute to the effort in developing Open Source tools. -
dc.description.affiliations OE; AISA; OE; Unito; IBL PAN; Ubiquity Press; C2DH; Hypothes.is; Stockholm University Press -
dc.description.allpeople Gingold A.; Di Donato F.; Gendre P.; Giglia E.;Maryl M.; Mowlam T.; Sillaume G.; Staines H.; Wennström S. -
dc.description.allpeopleoriginal Gingold A., Di Donato F., Gendre P., Giglia E.,Maryl M., Mowlam T., Sillaume G., Staines H., Wennström S. -
dc.description.fulltext none en
dc.description.numberofauthors 1 -
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/381980 -
dc.identifier.url https://zenodo.org/record/1324110 -
dc.language.iso eng -
dc.subject.keywords Open Science -
dc.subject.keywords operas -
dc.subject.singlekeyword Open Science *
dc.subject.singlekeyword operas *
dc.title OPERAS Tools Research and Development White Paper en
dc.type.driver info:eu-repo/semantics/other -
dc.type.full 08 Report e Working Paper::08.01 Rapporto di progetto it
dc.type.miur -2.0 -
dc.ugov.classaux1 Rapporto finale di progetto -
dc.ugov.descaux1 426044 -
iris.orcid.lastModifiedDate 2024/03/20 12:45:05 *
iris.orcid.lastModifiedMillisecond 1710935105867 *
iris.sitodocente.maxattempts 1 -
Appare nelle tipologie: 08.01 Rapporto di progetto
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/381980
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact