In the literature two intrinsic paramagnetic centers have been identified by EPR in pure zirconia: Zr3+ ions, yielding an axial signal (g = 1.958 and g = 1.979) and electrons trapped in oxygen vacancies (V). In this study we investigated by quantitative-EPR pure and doped ZrO2 heated in air and redox treated at various temperatures. In pure and in doped zirconia the axial signal has similar spectral features, including the satellite line due to the most intense component of 53Cr hyperfine structure, and the signal intensity yielded the same redox trend. In doped zirconia the concentration of the species yielding the axial signal was a constant fraction (about 50%) of the total chromium content. In pure zirconia samples, the concentration determined by EPR was also about 50% of the Cr impurity level determined by GFAAS. These findings attribute this signal to the extrinsic center, Cr5+ ion, arising from chromium impurity. In reduced zirconia a signal of Lorentzian shape (g = 2.002; Hpp = 4-5 G) arises from the only intrinsic defect detected by EPR in zirconia bulk, namely V center. This signal could easily be confused with another having the same g value, but a different line width (Hpp = 0.5-1 G) and line shape that forms in some vacuum-activated zirconia samples and arises from an extrinsic center, carbon paramagnetic impurity.
Intrinsic and Extrinsic Paramagnetic Centers in Zirconia
Dragone R
2002
Abstract
In the literature two intrinsic paramagnetic centers have been identified by EPR in pure zirconia: Zr3+ ions, yielding an axial signal (g = 1.958 and g = 1.979) and electrons trapped in oxygen vacancies (V). In this study we investigated by quantitative-EPR pure and doped ZrO2 heated in air and redox treated at various temperatures. In pure and in doped zirconia the axial signal has similar spectral features, including the satellite line due to the most intense component of 53Cr hyperfine structure, and the signal intensity yielded the same redox trend. In doped zirconia the concentration of the species yielding the axial signal was a constant fraction (about 50%) of the total chromium content. In pure zirconia samples, the concentration determined by EPR was also about 50% of the Cr impurity level determined by GFAAS. These findings attribute this signal to the extrinsic center, Cr5+ ion, arising from chromium impurity. In reduced zirconia a signal of Lorentzian shape (g = 2.002; Hpp = 4-5 G) arises from the only intrinsic defect detected by EPR in zirconia bulk, namely V center. This signal could easily be confused with another having the same g value, but a different line width (Hpp = 0.5-1 G) and line shape that forms in some vacuum-activated zirconia samples and arises from an extrinsic center, carbon paramagnetic impurity.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.