The main purposes of this work was to evaluate from a theoretical point of view the performance of silica membrane reactors (MRs) in various configurations for generating hydrogen via methanol steam reforming (MSR) reaction using a two dimensional computational fluid dynamic (CFD) method, presenting details about molar fractions of gas species, velocity and pressure distributions at the simulated conditions. The CFD model was firstly validated and, then, used for the simulations, achieving an acceptable agreement between numerical outcomes and experimental data. The simulations were realized for MSR reaction carried out in three types of silica MRs, namely: 1) silica MR with cocurrent flow pattern (MR1); 2) silica MR with countercurrent flow pattern (MR2); 3) silica MR with countercurrent flow pattern including a water gas shift (WGS) reaction stage in the permeate side (MR3), meanwhile comparing the results with a traditional reactor (TR). The influence of several operating parameters (reaction temperature and pressure, and feed flow rate) on the performance of the aforementioned silica MRs in terms of methanol conversion, hydrogen yield and CO-selectivity was evaluated and the results compared with an equivalent TR. The simulations via CFD method indicated the MR3 results to be the best solution over the other MR proposed configurations and the TR as well, presenting the best simulation results at 10 bar of transmembrane pressure, 513 K, SF ¼ 6, GHSV ¼ 6000 h1 and feed molar ratio ¼ 3/1 with CO selectivity 0.04%, methanol conversion and hydrogen yield >90%.

Theoretical evaluation of various configurations of silica membrane reactor in methanol steam reforming using CFD method

A Iulianelli;A Basile
2020

Abstract

The main purposes of this work was to evaluate from a theoretical point of view the performance of silica membrane reactors (MRs) in various configurations for generating hydrogen via methanol steam reforming (MSR) reaction using a two dimensional computational fluid dynamic (CFD) method, presenting details about molar fractions of gas species, velocity and pressure distributions at the simulated conditions. The CFD model was firstly validated and, then, used for the simulations, achieving an acceptable agreement between numerical outcomes and experimental data. The simulations were realized for MSR reaction carried out in three types of silica MRs, namely: 1) silica MR with cocurrent flow pattern (MR1); 2) silica MR with countercurrent flow pattern (MR2); 3) silica MR with countercurrent flow pattern including a water gas shift (WGS) reaction stage in the permeate side (MR3), meanwhile comparing the results with a traditional reactor (TR). The influence of several operating parameters (reaction temperature and pressure, and feed flow rate) on the performance of the aforementioned silica MRs in terms of methanol conversion, hydrogen yield and CO-selectivity was evaluated and the results compared with an equivalent TR. The simulations via CFD method indicated the MR3 results to be the best solution over the other MR proposed configurations and the TR as well, presenting the best simulation results at 10 bar of transmembrane pressure, 513 K, SF ¼ 6, GHSV ¼ 6000 h1 and feed molar ratio ¼ 3/1 with CO selectivity 0.04%, methanol conversion and hydrogen yield >90%.
2020
Istituto per la Tecnologia delle Membrane - ITM
CFD method
methanol steam reforming reaction
silica membrane reactor
hydrogen production
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
prod_404337-doc_150599.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: Ghasemzadeh et al. - International Journal of Hydrogen Energy - 45 (2020) 7354-7363
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Dimensione 1.86 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.86 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/386799
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 31
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact