This paper presents two scenarios used for generation of a runaway electron (RE) beam in the COMPASS tokamak with a focus on the decay phase and control of the beam. The first scenario consists of massive gas injection of argon into the current ramp-up phase, leading to a disruption accompanied by runaway plateau generation. In the second scenario, injection of a smaller amount of gas is used in order to isolate the RE beam from high erature plasma. The performances of current control and radial and vertical position feedback control in the second scenario were experimentally studied and analysed. The role of RE energy in the radial position stability of the RE beam seems to be crucial. A comparison of the decay phase of the RE beam in various amounts of Ar or Ne was studied using absolute extreme ultraviolet (AXUV) tomography and hard X-ray (HXR) intensity measurement. Argon clearly leads to higher HXR fluxes for the same current decay rate than neon, while radiated power based on AXUV measurements is larger for Ne in the same set of discharges.

Runaway electron beam stability and decay in COMPASS

Gobbin M;
2019

Abstract

This paper presents two scenarios used for generation of a runaway electron (RE) beam in the COMPASS tokamak with a focus on the decay phase and control of the beam. The first scenario consists of massive gas injection of argon into the current ramp-up phase, leading to a disruption accompanied by runaway plateau generation. In the second scenario, injection of a smaller amount of gas is used in order to isolate the RE beam from high erature plasma. The performances of current control and radial and vertical position feedback control in the second scenario were experimentally studied and analysed. The role of RE energy in the radial position stability of the RE beam seems to be crucial. A comparison of the decay phase of the RE beam in various amounts of Ar or Ne was studied using absolute extreme ultraviolet (AXUV) tomography and hard X-ray (HXR) intensity measurement. Argon clearly leads to higher HXR fluxes for the same current decay rate than neon, while radiated power based on AXUV measurements is larger for Ne in the same set of discharges.
2019
Istituto gas ionizzati - IGI - Sede Padova
Inglese
59
9
096036-1
096036-12
12
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1741-4326/ab210f/meta
Sì, ma tipo non specificato
tokamaks
disruptions
runaway electrons
tomography
Article Number: 096036 / E-ISSN: 1741-4326 / http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-85072086994&partnerID=q2rCbXpz / The work has been supported by the grant GA18-02482S of the Czech Science Foundation and also by the grant No. SGS19/180/OHK4/3T/14 of the Grant Agency of the Czech Technical University in Prague. The experiments were sup-ported by project Nos. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000768 and LM2015045, co-funded from European structural and investment funds and carried out within the framework of the EUROfusion Consortium. The work has also received funding from the Euratom research and training programme 2014-2018 under grant agreement No. 633053 with the Co-fund by the MEYS project number 8D15001.
1
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Ficker O.; MacUsova E.; Mlynar J.; Bren D.; Casolari A.; Cerovsky J.; Farnik M.; Grover O.; Havlicek J.; Havranek A.; Hron M.; Imrisek M.; Jerab M.; K...espandi
01 Contributo su Rivista::01.01 Articolo in rivista
none
   Implementation of activities described in the Roadmap to Fusion during Horizon 2020 through a Joint programme of the members of the EUROfusion consortium
   EUROfusion
   H2020
   633053
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/389398
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 25
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 22
social impact