Microblogs are increasingly exploited for predicting prices and traded volumes of stocks in financial markets. However, it has been demonstrated that much of the content shared in microblogging platforms is created and publicized by bots and spammers. Yet, the presence (or lack thereof) and the impact of fake stock microblogs has never been systematically investigated before. Here, we study 9M tweets related to stocks of the five main financial markets in the US. By comparing tweets with financial data from Google Finance, we highlight important characteristics of Twitter stock microblogs. More importantly, we uncover a malicious practice-referred to as cashtag piggybacking-perpetrated by coordinated groups of bots and likely aimed at promoting low-value stocks by exploiting the popularity of high-value ones. Among the findings of our study is that as much as 71% of the authors of suspicious financial tweets are classified as bots by a state-of-the-art spambot-detection algorithm. Furthermore, 37% of them were suspended by Twitter a few months after our investigation. Our results call for the adoption of spam- and bot-detection techniques in all studies and applications that exploit user-generated content for predicting the stock market.

Cashtag piggybacking: Uncovering spam and bot activity in stock microblogs on twitter

Cresci S;Tardelli S;Tesconi M
2019

Abstract

Microblogs are increasingly exploited for predicting prices and traded volumes of stocks in financial markets. However, it has been demonstrated that much of the content shared in microblogging platforms is created and publicized by bots and spammers. Yet, the presence (or lack thereof) and the impact of fake stock microblogs has never been systematically investigated before. Here, we study 9M tweets related to stocks of the five main financial markets in the US. By comparing tweets with financial data from Google Finance, we highlight important characteristics of Twitter stock microblogs. More importantly, we uncover a malicious practice-referred to as cashtag piggybacking-perpetrated by coordinated groups of bots and likely aimed at promoting low-value stocks by exploiting the popularity of high-value ones. Among the findings of our study is that as much as 71% of the authors of suspicious financial tweets are classified as bots by a state-of-the-art spambot-detection algorithm. Furthermore, 37% of them were suspended by Twitter a few months after our investigation. Our results call for the adoption of spam- and bot-detection techniques in all studies and applications that exploit user-generated content for predicting the stock market.
2019
Istituto di informatica e telematica - IIT
Social spam; social networks security; spam and bot detection; stock market; Twitter
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
prod_409950-doc_184506.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: 409950
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 5.39 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
5.39 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
prod_409950-doc_189241.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: Cashtag piggybacking
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 20.41 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
20.41 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/390661
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 113
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 89
social impact