Polytopal Element Methods (PEM) allow us solving differential equations on generalpolygonal and polyhedral grids, potentially offering great flexibility to meshgeneration algorithms. Differently from classical finite element methods, wherethe relation between the geometric properties of the mesh and the performances ofthe solver are well known, the characterization of a good polytopal element is stillsubject to ongoing research. Current shape regularity criteria are quite restrictive,and greatly limit the set of valid meshes. Nevertheless, numerical experiments revealedthat PEM solvers can perform well on meshes that are far outside the strictboundaries imposed by the current theory, suggesting that the real capabilities ofthese methods are much higher. In this work, we propose a benchmark to studythe correlation between general 2D polygonal meshes and PEM solvers which wetest on a virtual element solver for the Poisson equation. The benchmark aims toexplore the space of 2D polygonal meshes and polygonal quality metrics, in orderto understand if and how shape regularity, defined according to different criteria,affects the performance of the method. The proposed tool is quite general, andcan be potentially used to study any PEM solver. Besides discussing the basics ofthe benchmark, we demonstrate its application on a representative member of thePEM family, namely the Virtual Element Method, also discussing our findings.

Benchmarking the geometrical robustness of a Virtual Element Poisson solver

M. Attene;S. Biasotti;S. Bertoluzza;D. Cabiddu;M. Livesu;Giuseppe Patane;M. Pennacchio;D. Prada;M. Spagnuolo
2021

Abstract

Polytopal Element Methods (PEM) allow us solving differential equations on generalpolygonal and polyhedral grids, potentially offering great flexibility to meshgeneration algorithms. Differently from classical finite element methods, wherethe relation between the geometric properties of the mesh and the performances ofthe solver are well known, the characterization of a good polytopal element is stillsubject to ongoing research. Current shape regularity criteria are quite restrictive,and greatly limit the set of valid meshes. Nevertheless, numerical experiments revealedthat PEM solvers can perform well on meshes that are far outside the strictboundaries imposed by the current theory, suggesting that the real capabilities ofthese methods are much higher. In this work, we propose a benchmark to studythe correlation between general 2D polygonal meshes and PEM solvers which wetest on a virtual element solver for the Poisson equation. The benchmark aims toexplore the space of 2D polygonal meshes and polygonal quality metrics, in orderto understand if and how shape regularity, defined according to different criteria,affects the performance of the method. The proposed tool is quite general, andcan be potentially used to study any PEM solver. Besides discussing the basics ofthe benchmark, we demonstrate its application on a representative member of thePEM family, namely the Virtual Element Method, also discussing our findings.
2021
Istituto di Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche - IMATI -
Istituto di Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche - IMATI - Sede Secondaria Genova
Polytopal Element Methods
Virtual Element Methods
Polygonal Meshes
Geometric Metrics
Geometry-PEM Correlation
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
prod_455685-doc_176165.pdf

Open Access dal 30/07/2023

Descrizione: Benchmarking the geometrical robustness of a Virtual Element Poisson solver
Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 10.23 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
10.23 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
prod_455685-doc_177352.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: Benchmarking the geometrical robustness of a Virtual Element Poisson solver
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 6.18 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
6.18 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/396089
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 14
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
social impact