A potential strategy for mitigating nitrous oxide (NO) emissions from permanent grasslands is the partial substitution of fertilizer nitrogen (N) with symbiotically fixed nitrogen (N) from legumes. The input of N reduces the energy costs of producing fertilizer and provides a supply of nitrogen (N) for plants that is more synchronous to plant demand than occasional fertilizer applications. Legumes have been promoted as a potential NO mitigation strategy for grasslands, but evidence to support their efficacy is limited, partly due to the difficulty in conducting experiments across the large range of potential combinations of legume proportions and fertilizer N inputs. These experimental constraints can be overcome by biogeochemical models that can vary legume-fertilizer combinations and subsequently aid the design of targeted experiments. Using two variants each of two biogeochemical models (APSIM and DayCent), we tested the NO mitigation potential and productivity of full factorial combinations of legume proportions and fertilizer rates for five temperate grassland sites across the globe. Both models showed that replacing fertilizer with legumes reduced NO emissions without reducing productivity across a broad range of legume-fertilizer combinations. Although the models were consistent with the relative changes of NO emissions compared to the baseline scenario (200 kg N ha yr; no legumes), they predicted different levels of absolute NO emissions and thus also of absolute NO emission reductions; both were greater in DayCent than in APSIM. We recommend confirming these results with experimental studies assessing the effect of clover proportions in the range 30-50% and <=150 kg N ha yr input as these were identified as best-bet climate smart agricultural practices.

Evaluating the Potential of Legumes to Mitigate N2O Emissions From Permanent Grassland Using Process-Based Models

Brilli Lorenzo;
2020

Abstract

A potential strategy for mitigating nitrous oxide (NO) emissions from permanent grasslands is the partial substitution of fertilizer nitrogen (N) with symbiotically fixed nitrogen (N) from legumes. The input of N reduces the energy costs of producing fertilizer and provides a supply of nitrogen (N) for plants that is more synchronous to plant demand than occasional fertilizer applications. Legumes have been promoted as a potential NO mitigation strategy for grasslands, but evidence to support their efficacy is limited, partly due to the difficulty in conducting experiments across the large range of potential combinations of legume proportions and fertilizer N inputs. These experimental constraints can be overcome by biogeochemical models that can vary legume-fertilizer combinations and subsequently aid the design of targeted experiments. Using two variants each of two biogeochemical models (APSIM and DayCent), we tested the NO mitigation potential and productivity of full factorial combinations of legume proportions and fertilizer rates for five temperate grassland sites across the globe. Both models showed that replacing fertilizer with legumes reduced NO emissions without reducing productivity across a broad range of legume-fertilizer combinations. Although the models were consistent with the relative changes of NO emissions compared to the baseline scenario (200 kg N ha yr; no legumes), they predicted different levels of absolute NO emissions and thus also of absolute NO emission reductions; both were greater in DayCent than in APSIM. We recommend confirming these results with experimental studies assessing the effect of clover proportions in the range 30-50% and <=150 kg N ha yr input as these were identified as best-bet climate smart agricultural practices.
2020
biological nitrogen fixation
greenhouse gas mitigation
legumes
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/397820
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 17
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact