In the current implementations of Object Database Systems, the physical database organization is usually hard-coded in the system, i.e., the strategy (or memorizing the data objects is fixed and usually reflects the logical object definitions. Instead, the possibility of choosing the most suitable physical organization for an object database would be essential. In this paper, a canonical object data model and a storage object data model are presented. In the first, the objects are organized in classes; in the second, physical objects with similar structures are grouped in collections. Mechanisms for mapping data structures from the logical level to the physical level are discussed, and a comprehensive example is given.
Physical independence in object databases
Aloia N;Rabitti F
1992
Abstract
In the current implementations of Object Database Systems, the physical database organization is usually hard-coded in the system, i.e., the strategy (or memorizing the data objects is fixed and usually reflects the logical object definitions. Instead, the possibility of choosing the most suitable physical organization for an object database would be essential. In this paper, a canonical object data model and a storage object data model are presented. In the first, the objects are organized in classes; in the second, physical objects with similar structures are grouped in collections. Mechanisms for mapping data structures from the logical level to the physical level are discussed, and a comprehensive example is given.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
prod_453419-doc_172227.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Descrizione: Physical independence in object databases
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Dimensione
2.32 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.32 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


