The subgenus Liophloeus Weise, 1894 of Liophloeus Germar, 1817 (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Entiminae: Polydrusini) consists offive morphologically similar species traditionally diagnosed based on the shape of the aedeagus. However, traits of the genital apparatus exhibit substantial and overlapping inter- and intraspecific variation. All five species have the same ecological requirementsand occur in central and eastern Europe, mostly in montane areas. The focus of this work was to verify the taxonomic status andvalidity of Liophloeodes species using a combination of molecular and morphometric techniques. Specimens were collected from theentire distribution range and initially assigned to a species according to the aedeagal shape. Genetic diversity and phylogeny of thesubgenus were studied using three molecular markers (two ribosomal, 28S-D2 and ITS2, and one mitochondrial, COI). Moreover,several morphological characters were used for multivariate morphometric analyses. Finally, presence and prevalence of bacterial endosymbionts among species were investigated. Phylogenies based on ribosomal markers suggest that traditional species are correctlydelimited, whereas COI phylogeny suggests hybridization and introgression occurring between Liophloeodes species. Morphometricanalyses confirmed low interspecific diversity. Two major bacterial endosymbionts, Rickettsia and Wolbachia, were detected in manypopulations. We argue that Liophloeodes consists of young lineages whose evolution and diversification was possibly mediated bycyclic climate change events.

An integrative revision of the subgenus Liophloeodes (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Entiminae: Polydrusini): taxonomic, systematic, biogeographic and evolutionary insights.

Nugnes F;Bernardo U;
2021

Abstract

The subgenus Liophloeus Weise, 1894 of Liophloeus Germar, 1817 (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Entiminae: Polydrusini) consists offive morphologically similar species traditionally diagnosed based on the shape of the aedeagus. However, traits of the genital apparatus exhibit substantial and overlapping inter- and intraspecific variation. All five species have the same ecological requirementsand occur in central and eastern Europe, mostly in montane areas. The focus of this work was to verify the taxonomic status andvalidity of Liophloeodes species using a combination of molecular and morphometric techniques. Specimens were collected from theentire distribution range and initially assigned to a species according to the aedeagal shape. Genetic diversity and phylogeny of thesubgenus were studied using three molecular markers (two ribosomal, 28S-D2 and ITS2, and one mitochondrial, COI). Moreover,several morphological characters were used for multivariate morphometric analyses. Finally, presence and prevalence of bacterial endosymbionts among species were investigated. Phylogenies based on ribosomal markers suggest that traditional species are correctlydelimited, whereas COI phylogeny suggests hybridization and introgression occurring between Liophloeodes species. Morphometricanalyses confirmed low interspecific diversity. Two major bacterial endosymbionts, Rickettsia and Wolbachia, were detected in manypopulations. We argue that Liophloeodes consists of young lineages whose evolution and diversification was possibly mediated bycyclic climate change events.
2021
Istituto per la Protezione Sostenibile delle Piante - IPSP
Istituto per la Protezione Sostenibile delle Piante - IPSP - Sede Secondaria Portici (NA)
molecular markers
morphometry
phylogeny
taxonomy
weevils.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
prod_457979-doc_177857.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Waclawik et al ASP 2021
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 23.24 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
23.24 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/399358
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact