This article analyses three ethical arguments against the use of gene-drive technologies to control for, and possibly extinguish, a particular species of vector mosquitoes (Anopheles gambiae) causing the malaria infection. We conclude that none of these arguments is truly persuasive in the specific case and, therefore, that using gene-drive technologies to suppress or eradicate the population of Anopheles gambiae could be ethically justifiable provided certain cautions referring to ecological consequences, evolutionary effects and social engagement of local communities.

What is wrong in extinguishing a species? charting the ethical challenges of using gene-drive technologies to eradicate A. gambiae vector populations

Marco Annoni;
2021

Abstract

This article analyses three ethical arguments against the use of gene-drive technologies to control for, and possibly extinguish, a particular species of vector mosquitoes (Anopheles gambiae) causing the malaria infection. We conclude that none of these arguments is truly persuasive in the specific case and, therefore, that using gene-drive technologies to suppress or eradicate the population of Anopheles gambiae could be ethically justifiable provided certain cautions referring to ecological consequences, evolutionary effects and social engagement of local communities.
2021
Gene-Drive
Genome-editing
Bioethics
CRISPR-Cas9
Biodiversity
Ecology
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/401427
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact