A group is in a state of pluralistic ignorance (PI) if, roughly speaking, every member of the group thinks that his or her belief or desire is different from the beliefs or desires of the other members of the group. PI has been invoked to explain many otherwise puzzling phenomena in social psychology. The main purpose of this article is to shed light on the nature of PI states - their structure, internal consistency and opacity - using the formal apparatus of Dynamic Doxastic Logic, and also to study the sense in which such states are "fragile", i.e. to identify plausible conditions under which a PI state cascades into a state of shared belief as the result of announcement.

A DDL Approach to Pluralistic Ignorance and Collective Belief

Proietti Carlo;
2014

Abstract

A group is in a state of pluralistic ignorance (PI) if, roughly speaking, every member of the group thinks that his or her belief or desire is different from the beliefs or desires of the other members of the group. PI has been invoked to explain many otherwise puzzling phenomena in social psychology. The main purpose of this article is to shed light on the nature of PI states - their structure, internal consistency and opacity - using the formal apparatus of Dynamic Doxastic Logic, and also to study the sense in which such states are "fragile", i.e. to identify plausible conditions under which a PI state cascades into a state of shared belief as the result of announcement.
Campo DC Valore Lingua
dc.authority.ancejournal JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL LOGIC -
dc.authority.orgunit Istituto di linguistica computazionale "Antonio Zampolli" - ILC -
dc.authority.people Proietti Carlo it
dc.authority.people Olsson Erik J it
dc.collection.id.s b3f88f24-048a-4e43-8ab1-6697b90e068e *
dc.collection.name 01.01 Articolo in rivista *
dc.contributor.appartenenza Istituto di linguistica computazionale "Antonio Zampolli" - ILC *
dc.contributor.appartenenza.mi 918 *
dc.date.accessioned 2024/02/19 11:53:04 -
dc.date.available 2024/02/19 11:53:04 -
dc.date.issued 2014 -
dc.description.abstracteng A group is in a state of pluralistic ignorance (PI) if, roughly speaking, every member of the group thinks that his or her belief or desire is different from the beliefs or desires of the other members of the group. PI has been invoked to explain many otherwise puzzling phenomena in social psychology. The main purpose of this article is to shed light on the nature of PI states - their structure, internal consistency and opacity - using the formal apparatus of Dynamic Doxastic Logic, and also to study the sense in which such states are "fragile", i.e. to identify plausible conditions under which a PI state cascades into a state of shared belief as the result of announcement. -
dc.description.affiliations Lund University -
dc.description.allpeople Proietti, Carlo; Olsson, Erik J. -
dc.description.allpeopleoriginal Proietti, Carlo; Olsson, Erik J. -
dc.description.fulltext none en
dc.description.numberofauthors 1 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s10992-013-9277-3 -
dc.identifier.isi WOS:000338130900011 -
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-84902660333 -
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/405480 -
dc.language.iso eng -
dc.miur.last.status.update 2026-05-18T13:40:39Z *
dc.relation.firstpage 499 -
dc.relation.issue 2-3 -
dc.relation.lastpage 515 -
dc.relation.numberofpages 17 -
dc.relation.volume 43 -
dc.subject.keywords Pluralistic ignorance -
dc.subject.keywords Informational cascades -
dc.subject.keywords Dynamic logic -
dc.subject.keywords Social epistemology -
dc.subject.singlekeyword Pluralistic ignorance *
dc.subject.singlekeyword Informational cascades *
dc.subject.singlekeyword Dynamic logic *
dc.subject.singlekeyword Social epistemology *
dc.title A DDL Approach to Pluralistic Ignorance and Collective Belief en
dc.type.driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article -
dc.type.full 01 Contributo su Rivista::01.01 Articolo in rivista it
dc.type.miur 262 -
dc.type.referee Sì, ma tipo non specificato -
dc.ugov.descaux1 429487 -
iris.isi.extIssued 2014 -
iris.isi.extTitle A DDL Approach to Pluralistic Ignorance and Collective Belief -
iris.isi.metadataErrorDescription 0 -
iris.isi.metadataErrorType ERROR_NO_MATCH -
iris.isi.metadataStatus ERROR -
iris.orcid.lastModifiedDate 2026/05/19 12:06:43 *
iris.orcid.lastModifiedMillisecond 1779185203306 *
iris.scopus.extIssued 2014 -
iris.scopus.extTitle A DDL Approach to Pluralistic Ignorance and Collective Belief -
iris.scopus.ideLinkStatusDate 2024/06/22 23:32:37 *
iris.scopus.ideLinkStatusMillisecond 1719091957661 *
iris.sitodocente.maxattempts 1 -
iris.unpaywall.doi 10.1007/s10992-013-9277-3 *
iris.unpaywall.isoa false *
iris.unpaywall.journalisindoaj false *
iris.unpaywall.metadataCallLastModified 20/05/2026 02:58:25 -
iris.unpaywall.metadataCallLastModifiedMillisecond 1779238705877 -
iris.unpaywall.oastatus closed *
isi.authority.ancejournal JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL LOGIC###0022-3611 *
isi.category QL *
isi.category UA *
isi.contributor.affiliation Lund University -
isi.contributor.affiliation Lund University -
isi.contributor.country Sweden -
isi.contributor.country Sweden -
isi.contributor.name Carlo -
isi.contributor.name Erik J. -
isi.contributor.researcherId DLT-4783-2022 -
isi.contributor.researcherId JYD-9300-2024 -
isi.contributor.subaffiliation Dept Philosophy -
isi.contributor.subaffiliation Dept Philosophy -
isi.contributor.surname Proietti -
isi.contributor.surname Olsson -
isi.date.issued 2014 *
isi.description.abstracteng A group is in a state of pluralistic ignorance (PI) if, roughly speaking, every member of the group thinks that his or her belief or desire is different from the beliefs or desires of the other members of the group. PI has been invoked to explain many otherwise puzzling phenomena in social psychology. The main purpose of this article is to shed light on the nature of PI states - their structure, internal consistency and opacity - using the formal apparatus of Dynamic Doxastic Logic, and also to study the sense in which such states are "fragile", i.e. to identify plausible conditions under which a PI state cascades into a state of shared belief as the result of announcement. *
isi.description.allpeopleoriginal Proietti, C; Olsson, EJ; *
isi.document.sourcetype WOS.AHCI *
isi.document.type Article *
isi.document.types Article *
isi.identifier.doi 10.1007/s10992-013-9277-3 *
isi.identifier.eissn 1573-0433 *
isi.identifier.isi WOS:000338130900011 *
isi.journal.journaltitle JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL LOGIC *
isi.journal.journaltitleabbrev J PHILOS LOGIC *
isi.language.original English *
isi.publisher.place VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS *
isi.relation.firstpage 499 *
isi.relation.issue 2-3 *
isi.relation.lastpage 515 *
isi.relation.volume 43 *
isi.title A DDL Approach to Pluralistic Ignorance and Collective Belief *
scopus.authority.ancejournal JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL LOGIC###0022-3611 *
scopus.category 1211 *
scopus.contributor.affiliation Department of Philosophy, Lund University -
scopus.contributor.affiliation Department of Philosophy, Lund University -
scopus.contributor.afid 60029170 -
scopus.contributor.afid 60029170 -
scopus.contributor.auid 35148455900 -
scopus.contributor.auid 25028369000 -
scopus.contributor.country Sweden -
scopus.contributor.country Sweden -
scopus.contributor.dptid 112994446 -
scopus.contributor.dptid 112994446 -
scopus.contributor.name Carlo -
scopus.contributor.name Erik J. -
scopus.contributor.subaffiliation -
scopus.contributor.subaffiliation -
scopus.contributor.surname Proietti -
scopus.contributor.surname Olsson -
scopus.date.issued 2014 *
scopus.description.abstracteng A group is in a state of pluralistic ignorance (PI) if, roughly speaking, every member of the group thinks that his or her belief or desire is different from the beliefs or desires of the other members of the group. PI has been invoked to explain many otherwise puzzling phenomena in social psychology. The main purpose of this article is to shed light on the nature of PI states - their structure, internal consistency and opacity - using the formal apparatus of Dynamic Doxastic Logic, and also to study the sense in which such states are "fragile", i.e. to identify plausible conditions under which a PI state cascades into a state of shared belief as the result of announcement. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. *
scopus.description.allpeopleoriginal Proietti C.; Olsson E.J. *
scopus.differences scopus.subject.keywords *
scopus.differences scopus.description.allpeopleoriginal *
scopus.differences scopus.description.abstracteng *
scopus.document.type ar *
scopus.document.types ar *
scopus.identifier.doi 10.1007/s10992-013-9277-3 *
scopus.identifier.eissn 1573-0433 *
scopus.identifier.pui 373348453 *
scopus.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-84902660333 *
scopus.journal.sourceid 4700152621 *
scopus.language.iso eng *
scopus.publisher.name Kluwer Academic Publishers *
scopus.relation.firstpage 499 *
scopus.relation.issue 2-3 *
scopus.relation.lastpage 515 *
scopus.relation.volume 43 *
scopus.subject.keywords Dynamic logic; Informational cascades; Pluralistic ignorance; Social epistemology; *
scopus.title A DDL Approach to Pluralistic Ignorance and Collective Belief *
scopus.titleeng A DDL Approach to Pluralistic Ignorance and Collective Belief *
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/405480
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact