The present work is motivated by two questions. (1) What should an intuitionistic epistemic logic look like? (2) How should one interpret the knowledge operator in a Kripke-model for it? In what follows we outline an answer to (2) and give a model-theoretic definition of the operator K. This will shed some light also on (1), since it turns out that K, defined as we do, fulfills the properties of a necessity operator for a normal modal logic. The interest of our construction also lies in a better insight into the intuitionistic solution to Fitch's paradox, which is discussed in the third section. In particular we examine, in the light of our definition, DeVidi and Solomon's proposal of formulating the verification thesis as . We show, as our main result, that this definition excapes the paradox, though it is validated only under restrictive conditions on the models.

Intuitionistic Epistemic Logic, Kripke Models and Fitch's Paradox

Proietti;Carlo
2012

Abstract

The present work is motivated by two questions. (1) What should an intuitionistic epistemic logic look like? (2) How should one interpret the knowledge operator in a Kripke-model for it? In what follows we outline an answer to (2) and give a model-theoretic definition of the operator K. This will shed some light also on (1), since it turns out that K, defined as we do, fulfills the properties of a necessity operator for a normal modal logic. The interest of our construction also lies in a better insight into the intuitionistic solution to Fitch's paradox, which is discussed in the third section. In particular we examine, in the light of our definition, DeVidi and Solomon's proposal of formulating the verification thesis as . We show, as our main result, that this definition excapes the paradox, though it is validated only under restrictive conditions on the models.
Campo DC Valore Lingua
dc.authority.ancejournal JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL LOGIC -
dc.authority.orgunit Istituto di linguistica computazionale "Antonio Zampolli" - ILC -
dc.authority.people Proietti it
dc.authority.people Carlo it
dc.collection.id.s b3f88f24-048a-4e43-8ab1-6697b90e068e *
dc.collection.name 01.01 Articolo in rivista *
dc.contributor.appartenenza Istituto di linguistica computazionale "Antonio Zampolli" - ILC *
dc.contributor.appartenenza.mi 918 *
dc.date.accessioned 2024/02/19 11:53:43 -
dc.date.available 2024/02/19 11:53:43 -
dc.date.issued 2012 -
dc.description.abstracteng The present work is motivated by two questions. (1) What should an intuitionistic epistemic logic look like? (2) How should one interpret the knowledge operator in a Kripke-model for it? In what follows we outline an answer to (2) and give a model-theoretic definition of the operator K. This will shed some light also on (1), since it turns out that K, defined as we do, fulfills the properties of a necessity operator for a normal modal logic. The interest of our construction also lies in a better insight into the intuitionistic solution to Fitch's paradox, which is discussed in the third section. In particular we examine, in the light of our definition, DeVidi and Solomon's proposal of formulating the verification thesis as . We show, as our main result, that this definition excapes the paradox, though it is validated only under restrictive conditions on the models. -
dc.description.affiliations Lund Univ -
dc.description.allpeople Proietti, Carlo; Proietti, Carlo -
dc.description.allpeopleoriginal Proietti, Carlo -
dc.description.fulltext none en
dc.description.numberofauthors 2 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s10992-011-9207-1 -
dc.identifier.isi WOS:000308871700004 -
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-84866497020 -
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/405484 -
dc.language.iso eng -
dc.relation.firstpage 877 -
dc.relation.issue 5 -
dc.relation.lastpage 900 -
dc.relation.numberofpages 24 -
dc.relation.volume 41 -
dc.subject.keywords Intuitionistic logic -
dc.subject.keywords Epistemic logic -
dc.subject.keywords Fitch's paradox -
dc.subject.keywords Kripke models -
dc.subject.singlekeyword Intuitionistic logic *
dc.subject.singlekeyword Epistemic logic *
dc.subject.singlekeyword Fitch's paradox *
dc.subject.singlekeyword Kripke models *
dc.title Intuitionistic Epistemic Logic, Kripke Models and Fitch's Paradox en
dc.type.driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article -
dc.type.full 01 Contributo su Rivista::01.01 Articolo in rivista it
dc.type.miur 262 -
dc.type.referee Sì, ma tipo non specificato -
dc.ugov.descaux1 429491 -
iris.isi.extIssued 2012 -
iris.isi.extTitle Intuitionistic Epistemic Logic, Kripke Models and Fitch's Paradox -
iris.orcid.lastModifiedDate 2025/04/11 01:14:43 *
iris.orcid.lastModifiedMillisecond 1744326883206 *
iris.scopus.extIssued 2012 -
iris.scopus.extTitle Intuitionistic Epistemic Logic, Kripke Models and Fitch's Paradox -
iris.scopus.ideLinkStatusDate 2024/06/22 23:34:30 *
iris.scopus.ideLinkStatusMillisecond 1719092070492 *
iris.sitodocente.maxattempts 4 -
iris.unpaywall.doi 10.1007/s10992-011-9207-1 *
iris.unpaywall.isoa false *
iris.unpaywall.journalisindoaj false *
iris.unpaywall.metadataCallLastModified 03/05/2025 04:26:53 -
iris.unpaywall.metadataCallLastModifiedMillisecond 1746239213928 -
iris.unpaywall.oastatus closed *
isi.authority.ancejournal JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL LOGIC###0022-3611 *
isi.category QL *
isi.category UA *
isi.contributor.affiliation -
isi.contributor.country -
isi.contributor.name Carlo -
isi.contributor.researcherId DLT-4783-2022 -
isi.contributor.subaffiliation -
isi.contributor.surname Proietti -
isi.date.issued 2012 *
isi.description.abstracteng The present work is motivated by two questions. (1) What should an intuitionistic epistemic logic look like? (2) How should one interpret the knowledge operator in a Kripke-model for it? In what follows we outline an answer to (2) and give a model-theoretic definition of the operator K. This will shed some light also on (1), since it turns out that K, defined as we do, fulfills the properties of a necessity operator for a normal modal logic. The interest of our construction also lies in a better insight into the intuitionistic solution to Fitch's paradox, which is discussed in the third section. In particular we examine, in the light of our definition, DeVidi and Solomon's proposal of formulating the verification thesis as . We show, as our main result, that this definition excapes the paradox, though it is validated only under restrictive conditions on the models. *
isi.description.allpeopleoriginal Proietti, C; *
isi.document.sourcetype WOS.AHCI *
isi.document.type Article *
isi.document.types Article *
isi.identifier.doi 10.1007/s10992-011-9207-1 *
isi.identifier.isi WOS:000308871700004 *
isi.journal.journaltitle JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL LOGIC *
isi.journal.journaltitleabbrev J PHILOS LOGIC *
isi.language.original English *
isi.publisher.place VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS *
isi.relation.firstpage 877 *
isi.relation.issue 5 *
isi.relation.lastpage 900 *
isi.relation.volume 41 *
isi.title Intuitionistic Epistemic Logic, Kripke Models and Fitch's Paradox *
scopus.authority.ancejournal JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL LOGIC###0022-3611 *
scopus.category 1211 *
scopus.contributor.affiliation Lund University -
scopus.contributor.afid 60029170 -
scopus.contributor.auid 35148455900 -
scopus.contributor.country Sweden -
scopus.contributor.dptid 112994446 -
scopus.contributor.name Carlo -
scopus.contributor.subaffiliation Department of Philosophy; -
scopus.contributor.surname Proietti -
scopus.date.issued 2012 *
scopus.description.abstracteng The present work is motivated by two questions. (1) What should an intuitionistic epistemic logic look like? (2) How should one interpret the knowledge operator in a Kripke-model for it? In what follows we outline an answer to (2) and give a model-theoretic definition of the operator K. This will shed some light also on (1), since it turns out that K, defined as we do, fulfills the properties of a necessity operator for a normal modal logic. The interest of our construction also lies in a better insight into the intuitionistic solution to Fitch's paradox, which is discussed in the third section. In particular we examine, in the light of our definition, DeVidi and Solomon's proposal of formulating the verification thesis as φ{symbol} → ¬ ¬ K φ{symbol}. We show, as our main result, that this definition excapes the paradox, though it is validated only under restrictive conditions on the models. © 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. *
scopus.description.allpeopleoriginal Proietti C. *
scopus.differences scopus.subject.keywords *
scopus.differences scopus.description.allpeopleoriginal *
scopus.differences scopus.description.abstracteng *
scopus.document.type ar *
scopus.document.types ar *
scopus.identifier.doi 10.1007/s10992-011-9207-1 *
scopus.identifier.eissn 1573-0433 *
scopus.identifier.pui 365683902 *
scopus.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-84866497020 *
scopus.journal.sourceid 4700152621 *
scopus.language.iso eng *
scopus.relation.firstpage 877 *
scopus.relation.issue 5 *
scopus.relation.lastpage 900 *
scopus.relation.volume 41 *
scopus.subject.keywords Epistemic logic; Fitch's paradox; Intuitionistic logic; Kripke models; *
scopus.title Intuitionistic Epistemic Logic, Kripke Models and Fitch's Paradox *
scopus.titleeng Intuitionistic Epistemic Logic, Kripke Models and Fitch's Paradox *
Appare nelle tipologie: 01.01 Articolo in rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/405484
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 19
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
social impact