Group polarization occurs when an initial attitude or belief of individuals becomes more radical after group discussion. Polarization often leads subgroups towards opposite directions. Since the 1960s this effect has been observed and repeatedly confirmed in lab experiments by social psychologists. Persuasive Arguments Theory (PAT) emerged as the most convincing explanation for this phenomenon. This paper is a first attempt to frame the PAT explanation more formally by means of Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks (BAFs). In particular, I show that polarization may emerge in a BAF by simple and rational belief updates by participants.

Understanding Group Polarization with Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks

Proietti;Carlo
2016

Abstract

Group polarization occurs when an initial attitude or belief of individuals becomes more radical after group discussion. Polarization often leads subgroups towards opposite directions. Since the 1960s this effect has been observed and repeatedly confirmed in lab experiments by social psychologists. Persuasive Arguments Theory (PAT) emerged as the most convincing explanation for this phenomenon. This paper is a first attempt to frame the PAT explanation more formally by means of Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks (BAFs). In particular, I show that polarization may emerge in a BAF by simple and rational belief updates by participants.
Campo DC Valore Lingua
dc.authority.orgunit Istituto di linguistica computazionale "Antonio Zampolli" - ILC -
dc.authority.people Proietti it
dc.authority.people Carlo it
dc.collection.id.s 71c7200a-7c5f-4e83-8d57-d3d2ba88f40d *
dc.collection.name 04.01 Contributo in Atti di convegno *
dc.contributor.appartenenza Istituto di linguistica computazionale "Antonio Zampolli" - ILC *
dc.contributor.appartenenza.mi 918 *
dc.date.accessioned 2024/02/19 11:55:56 -
dc.date.available 2024/02/19 11:55:56 -
dc.date.issued 2016 -
dc.description.abstracteng Group polarization occurs when an initial attitude or belief of individuals becomes more radical after group discussion. Polarization often leads subgroups towards opposite directions. Since the 1960s this effect has been observed and repeatedly confirmed in lab experiments by social psychologists. Persuasive Arguments Theory (PAT) emerged as the most convincing explanation for this phenomenon. This paper is a first attempt to frame the PAT explanation more formally by means of Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks (BAFs). In particular, I show that polarization may emerge in a BAF by simple and rational belief updates by participants. -
dc.description.affiliations Lund Univ -
dc.description.allpeople Proietti, Carlo; Proietti, Carlo -
dc.description.allpeopleoriginal Proietti, Carlo -
dc.description.fulltext none en
dc.description.numberofauthors 2 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.3233/978-1-61499-686-6-41 -
dc.identifier.isi WOS:000383377900006 -
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85100324592 -
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/405497 -
dc.language.iso eng -
dc.relation.conferencedate 13-16/09/2016 -
dc.relation.conferencename COMMA 2016 -
dc.relation.conferenceplace Potsdam -
dc.relation.firstpage 41 -
dc.relation.lastpage 52 -
dc.relation.numberofpages 12 -
dc.relation.volume 287 -
dc.subject.keywords Group Polarization -
dc.subject.keywords Persuasive Arguments Theory -
dc.subject.keywords Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks -
dc.subject.keywords Value-Based Argumentation Frameworks -
dc.subject.singlekeyword Group Polarization *
dc.subject.singlekeyword Persuasive Arguments Theory *
dc.subject.singlekeyword Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks *
dc.subject.singlekeyword Value-Based Argumentation Frameworks *
dc.title Understanding Group Polarization with Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks en
dc.type.driver info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject -
dc.type.full 04 Contributo in convegno::04.01 Contributo in Atti di convegno it
dc.type.miur 273 -
dc.type.referee Sì, ma tipo non specificato -
dc.ugov.descaux1 429504 -
iris.isi.extIssued 2016 -
iris.isi.extTitle Understanding Group Polarization with Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks -
iris.orcid.lastModifiedDate 2025/03/08 07:07:49 *
iris.orcid.lastModifiedMillisecond 1741414069706 *
iris.scopus.extIssued 2016 -
iris.scopus.extTitle Understanding Group Polarization with Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks -
iris.scopus.ideLinkStatusDate 2024/06/22 23:36:09 *
iris.scopus.ideLinkStatusMillisecond 1719092169229 *
iris.sitodocente.maxattempts 4 -
iris.unpaywall.bestoahost publisher *
iris.unpaywall.bestoaversion publishedVersion *
iris.unpaywall.doi 10.3233/978-1-61499-686-6-41 *
iris.unpaywall.hosttype publisher *
iris.unpaywall.isoa true *
iris.unpaywall.journalisindoaj false *
iris.unpaywall.landingpage https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-686-6-41 *
iris.unpaywall.license cc-by-nc *
iris.unpaywall.metadataCallLastModified 13/03/2026 04:40:45 -
iris.unpaywall.metadataCallLastModifiedMillisecond 1773373245753 -
iris.unpaywall.oastatus hybrid *
isi.authority.anceserie FRONTIERS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND APPLICATIONS###0922-6389 *
isi.category EP *
isi.category QL *
isi.contributor.affiliation Lund University -
isi.contributor.country Sweden -
isi.contributor.name Carlo -
isi.contributor.researcherId DLT-4783-2022 -
isi.contributor.subaffiliation -
isi.contributor.surname Proietti -
isi.date.issued 2016 *
isi.description.abstracteng Group polarization occurs when an initial attitude or belief of individuals becomes more radical after group discussion. Polarization often leads subgroups towards opposite directions. Since the 1960s this effect has been observed and repeatedly confirmed in lab experiments by social psychologists. Persuasive Arguments Theory (PAT) emerged as the most convincing explanation for this phenomenon. This paper is a first attempt to frame the PAT explanation more formally by means of Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks (BAFs). In particular, I show that polarization may emerge in a BAF by simple and rational belief updates by participants. *
isi.description.allpeopleoriginal Proietti, C; *
isi.document.sourcetype WOS.ISTP *
isi.document.type Proceedings Paper *
isi.document.types Proceedings Paper *
isi.identifier.doi 10.3233/978-1-61499-686-6-41 *
isi.identifier.isi WOS:000383377900006 *
isi.journal.journaltitle COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT *
isi.journal.journaltitleabbrev FRONT ARTIF INTEL AP *
isi.language.original English *
isi.publisher.place NIEUWE HEMWEG 6B, 1013 BG AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS *
isi.relation.firstpage 41 *
isi.relation.lastpage 52 *
isi.relation.volume 287 *
isi.title Understanding Group Polarization with Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks *
scopus.authority.anceserie FRONTIERS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND APPLICATIONS###0922-6389 *
scopus.category 1702 *
scopus.contributor.affiliation Lund University -
scopus.contributor.afid 60029170 -
scopus.contributor.auid 35148455900 -
scopus.contributor.country Sweden -
scopus.contributor.dptid -
scopus.contributor.name Carlo -
scopus.contributor.subaffiliation -
scopus.contributor.surname Proietti -
scopus.date.issued 2016 *
scopus.description.abstracteng Group polarization occurs when an initial attitude or belief of individuals becomes more radical after group discussion. Polarization often leads subgroups towards opposite directions. Since the 1960s this effect has been observed and repeatedly confirmed in lab experiments by social psychologists. Persuasive Arguments Theory (PAT) emerged as the most convincing explanation for this phenomenon. This paper is a first attempt to frame the PAT explanation more formally by means of Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks (BAFs). In particular, I show that polarization may emerge in a BAF by simple and rational belief updates by participants. *
scopus.description.allpeopleoriginal Proietti C. *
scopus.differences scopus.authority.anceserie *
scopus.differences scopus.publisher.name *
scopus.differences scopus.subject.keywords *
scopus.differences scopus.relation.conferencedate *
scopus.differences scopus.description.allpeopleoriginal *
scopus.differences scopus.relation.conferencename *
scopus.differences scopus.identifier.isbn *
scopus.differences scopus.relation.conferenceplace *
scopus.document.type cp *
scopus.document.types cp *
scopus.identifier.doi 10.3233/978-1-61499-686-6-41 *
scopus.identifier.eissn 1879-8314 *
scopus.identifier.isbn 9781614996859 *
scopus.identifier.pui 639172295 *
scopus.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85100324592 *
scopus.journal.sourceid 19500157321 *
scopus.language.iso eng *
scopus.publisher.name IOS Press BV *
scopus.relation.conferencedate 2016 *
scopus.relation.conferencename 6th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument, COMMA 2016 *
scopus.relation.conferenceplace deu *
scopus.relation.firstpage 41 *
scopus.relation.lastpage 52 *
scopus.relation.volume 287 *
scopus.subject.keywords Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks; Group Polarization; Persuasive Arguments Theory; Value-Based Argumentation Frameworks; *
scopus.title Understanding Group Polarization with Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks *
scopus.titleeng Understanding Group Polarization with Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks *
Appare nelle tipologie: 04.01 Contributo in Atti di convegno
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/405497
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact