An adaptive #-fidelity approach to metamodeling from noisy data is presented for design-space exploration and design optimization. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations with different numerical accuracy (spatial discretization) provides metamodel training sets affected by unavoidable numerical noise. The #-fidelity approximation is built by an additive correction of a low-fidelity metamodel with metamodels of differences (errors) between higher-fidelity levels whose hierarchy needs to be provided. The approach encompasses two core metamodeling techniques, namely: i) stochastic radial-basis functions (SRBF) and ii) Gaussian process (GP). The adaptivity stems from the sequential training procedure and the auto-tuning capabilities of the metamodels. The method is demonstrated for an analytical test problem and a CFD-based optimization of a NACA airfoil, where the fidelity levels are defined by an adaptive grid refinement technique of a Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) solver. The paper discusses: i) the effect of using more than two fidelity levels; ii) the use of least squares regression as opposed to exact interpolation; iii) the comparison between SRBF and GP; and iv) the use of two sampling approaches for GP. Results show that in presence of noise, the use of more than two fidelity levels improves the model accuracy with a significant reduction of the number of high-fidelity evaluations. Both least squares SRBF and GP provide promising results in dealing with noisy data.

Adaptive N-Fidelity Metamodels for Noisy CFD Data

Riccardo Pellegrini;Andrea Serani;Matteo Diez
2020

Abstract

An adaptive #-fidelity approach to metamodeling from noisy data is presented for design-space exploration and design optimization. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations with different numerical accuracy (spatial discretization) provides metamodel training sets affected by unavoidable numerical noise. The #-fidelity approximation is built by an additive correction of a low-fidelity metamodel with metamodels of differences (errors) between higher-fidelity levels whose hierarchy needs to be provided. The approach encompasses two core metamodeling techniques, namely: i) stochastic radial-basis functions (SRBF) and ii) Gaussian process (GP). The adaptivity stems from the sequential training procedure and the auto-tuning capabilities of the metamodels. The method is demonstrated for an analytical test problem and a CFD-based optimization of a NACA airfoil, where the fidelity levels are defined by an adaptive grid refinement technique of a Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) solver. The paper discusses: i) the effect of using more than two fidelity levels; ii) the use of least squares regression as opposed to exact interpolation; iii) the comparison between SRBF and GP; and iv) the use of two sampling approaches for GP. Results show that in presence of noise, the use of more than two fidelity levels improves the model accuracy with a significant reduction of the number of high-fidelity evaluations. Both least squares SRBF and GP provide promising results in dealing with noisy data.
2020
Istituto di iNgegneria del Mare - INM (ex INSEAN)
Inglese
AIAA AVIATION 2020 FORUM
17
https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.2020-3161
AIAA, American institute of aeronautics and astronautics (AIAA)
Reston [Va.]
STATI UNITI D'AMERICA
Sì, ma tipo non specificato
15-19/06/2020
multi-fidelity metamodels
gaussian process
stochastic radial basis functions
6
restricted
Wackers, Jeroen; Visonneau, Michel; Ficini, Simone; Pellegrini, Riccardo; Serani, Andrea; Diez, Matteo
273
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
04 Contributo in convegno::04.01 Contributo in Atti di convegno
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
prod_426859-doc_152162.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: Adaptive N-Fidelity Metamodels for Noisy CFD Data
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Dimensione 3 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/405724
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 13
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact