Classification, which means discrimination between examples belonging to different classes, is a fundamental aspect of most scientific applications. Machine Learning (ML) tools have proved to be very performing in this task, in the sense that they can achieve very high success rates. On the other hand, the "realism" and interpretability of their models are very low, resulting often in modest increases of knowledge and limited applicability. In this paper, a methodology is described, which, by applying ML tools directly to the data, allows formulating new scientific models that describe the actual "physics" determining the boundary between the classes. The proposed technique consists of a stacked approach of different ML tools, each one applied to a specific subtask of the scientific analysis; all together they combine all the major strands of machine learning, from rule based classifiers and Bayesian statistics to genetic programming and symbolic manipulation. To take into account the error bars of the measurements, an essential aspect of any scientific form of inference, the novel concept of the Geodesic Distance on Gaussian manifolds is adopted. The characteristics of the methodology have been investigated with a series of systematic numerical tests, for different types of classification problems. The potential of the approach to handle real data has been tested with various experimental databases. The obtained results indicate that the proposed method permits to find a good trade-off between accuracy of the classification and complexity of the derived mathematical equations. Moreover, the derived models can be tuned to reflect the actual phenomena, providing a very useful tool to bridge the gap between data, machine learning tools and scientific theories.

A Syncretic Approach to Knowledge Discovery for the Natural Sciences

Murari A;
2019

Abstract

Classification, which means discrimination between examples belonging to different classes, is a fundamental aspect of most scientific applications. Machine Learning (ML) tools have proved to be very performing in this task, in the sense that they can achieve very high success rates. On the other hand, the "realism" and interpretability of their models are very low, resulting often in modest increases of knowledge and limited applicability. In this paper, a methodology is described, which, by applying ML tools directly to the data, allows formulating new scientific models that describe the actual "physics" determining the boundary between the classes. The proposed technique consists of a stacked approach of different ML tools, each one applied to a specific subtask of the scientific analysis; all together they combine all the major strands of machine learning, from rule based classifiers and Bayesian statistics to genetic programming and symbolic manipulation. To take into account the error bars of the measurements, an essential aspect of any scientific form of inference, the novel concept of the Geodesic Distance on Gaussian manifolds is adopted. The characteristics of the methodology have been investigated with a series of systematic numerical tests, for different types of classification problems. The potential of the approach to handle real data has been tested with various experimental databases. The obtained results indicate that the proposed method permits to find a good trade-off between accuracy of the classification and complexity of the derived mathematical equations. Moreover, the derived models can be tuned to reflect the actual phenomena, providing a very useful tool to bridge the gap between data, machine learning tools and scientific theories.
2019
Istituto gas ionizzati - IGI - Sede Padova
Istituto per la Scienza e Tecnologia dei Plasmi - ISTP
Machine Learning
ML
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/406188
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact