In the present work the multi-phase SPH model presented in Grenier et al. (2009) is considered and extended through the inclusion of a diffusive term in the continuity equation. The latter based on the ?-SPH model of Antuono et al. (2012), allows to improve the evaluation of the pressure field, removing numerical noise and improving also the particles spatial distribution. The time stepping and the choice of the speeds of sound for the different phases are discussed, showing that this choice is driven not only by physical consideration but also by numerical constraints linked to the stability of the scheme. To this aim, comparisons are provided to a Riemann-SPH multi-phase model. In particular we show that the proposed ?-SPH multi-phase solver has a different stability region than its Riemann-SPH counterpart, allowing for bigger time steps for some density and speed of sound ratios, while in other conditions the Riemann-SPH multi-phase model is more convenient. A series of validating tests are carried out over different benchmarks widely used in the SPH literature. As a final test-case the water entry of a corrugated panel involving the entrapment of an air cavity is considered to show how the proposed multi-phase ?-SPH method is able to accurately treat complex water impact events.

Detailed study on the extension of the delta-SPH model to multi-phase flow

Marrone S;Colagrossi A;
2020

Abstract

In the present work the multi-phase SPH model presented in Grenier et al. (2009) is considered and extended through the inclusion of a diffusive term in the continuity equation. The latter based on the ?-SPH model of Antuono et al. (2012), allows to improve the evaluation of the pressure field, removing numerical noise and improving also the particles spatial distribution. The time stepping and the choice of the speeds of sound for the different phases are discussed, showing that this choice is driven not only by physical consideration but also by numerical constraints linked to the stability of the scheme. To this aim, comparisons are provided to a Riemann-SPH multi-phase model. In particular we show that the proposed ?-SPH multi-phase solver has a different stability region than its Riemann-SPH counterpart, allowing for bigger time steps for some density and speed of sound ratios, while in other conditions the Riemann-SPH multi-phase model is more convenient. A series of validating tests are carried out over different benchmarks widely used in the SPH literature. As a final test-case the water entry of a corrugated panel involving the entrapment of an air cavity is considered to show how the proposed multi-phase ?-SPH method is able to accurately treat complex water impact events.
2020
Istituto di iNgegneria del Mare - INM (ex INSEAN)
Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics
Multi-phase flows
Water impact
Air-cushion effects
?-SPH model
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
prod_428222-doc_152716.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: Detailed study on the extension of the ?-SPH model to multi-phase flow
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 8.54 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
8.54 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Hammani_etal_CMAME_2020_Finale.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Hammani_etal_CMAME_2020
Tipologia: Documento in Pre-print
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 7.29 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
7.29 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/409388
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 53
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact