It is historically renown that morphotypes referred to Hildoceras bifrons from the Apennines (Italy) and otherMediterranean localities differ in many ways from the typical species of the Central and North-West Europe.Besides overall smaller size (usually < 40 mm), Mediterranean specimens attain marked whorl embracement,comparable to that of the kin species Hildoceras semipolitum (albeit retaining a less compressed whorlsection). Relatively larger (and rare) morphotypes may show slight 'uncoiling' (resembling the typicalHildoceras bifrons), though limitedly to the final part of the adult-stage last whorl. Both the common(small-involute) and rare (larger-slightly uncoiled) morphotypes thus reveal of ambiguous taxonomic attributioneither as Hildoceras bifrons or as Hildoceras semipolitum. In front of this ambiguity, the new speciesHildoceras appenninicus sp. nov. is proposed for grouping 'bifrons-like' Hildoceras occurring in the Apenninesand other Mediterranean localities. In contrast with previous works on this subject, definite ranges for whorlcompression indexes relative to whorl diameter and embracement are provided, by this attempting at amore objective distinction of this new species from both Hildoceras bifrons and Hildoceras semipolitum.Finally, along with some biostratigraphic remarks, possible evolutionary and paleobiogeographic implicationsconcerning the arising and spreading of Hildoceras species are outlined.
The 'grooved' Hildoceras ammonite fauna from the Lower Jurassic (Toarcian) of the Apennines. Overview and proposal for a new species
Domenico Ridente
Primo
2022
Abstract
It is historically renown that morphotypes referred to Hildoceras bifrons from the Apennines (Italy) and otherMediterranean localities differ in many ways from the typical species of the Central and North-West Europe.Besides overall smaller size (usually < 40 mm), Mediterranean specimens attain marked whorl embracement,comparable to that of the kin species Hildoceras semipolitum (albeit retaining a less compressed whorlsection). Relatively larger (and rare) morphotypes may show slight 'uncoiling' (resembling the typicalHildoceras bifrons), though limitedly to the final part of the adult-stage last whorl. Both the common(small-involute) and rare (larger-slightly uncoiled) morphotypes thus reveal of ambiguous taxonomic attributioneither as Hildoceras bifrons or as Hildoceras semipolitum. In front of this ambiguity, the new speciesHildoceras appenninicus sp. nov. is proposed for grouping 'bifrons-like' Hildoceras occurring in the Apenninesand other Mediterranean localities. In contrast with previous works on this subject, definite ranges for whorlcompression indexes relative to whorl diameter and embracement are provided, by this attempting at amore objective distinction of this new species from both Hildoceras bifrons and Hildoceras semipolitum.Finally, along with some biostratigraphic remarks, possible evolutionary and paleobiogeographic implicationsconcerning the arising and spreading of Hildoceras species are outlined.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Grooved Hildoceras ammonite fauna_22.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
8.12 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
8.12 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


