Hydroxyapatite (HA) is a calcium phosphate used in many fields, including biomedicalapplications. In particular, ion-doped HA nanomaterials (nHA) are developed for their increasedbioactivity, particularly in the fields of regenerative medicine and nanomedicine. In this study, weassessed the ecotoxicological impact of five nHA materials: a synthesized calcium hydroxyapatite(CaP-HA), superparamagnetic iron-doped hydroxyapatite (Fe-HA), titanium-doped hydroxyapatite(Ti-HA), alginate/titanium-doped hydroxyapatite hybrid composite (Ti-HA-Alg), and a commercial HA.The soil ecotoxicology model species Folsomia candida (Collembola) was used, and besides the standardreproduction test (28 days), an extension to the standard for one more generation was performed(56 days). Assessed endpoints included the standard survival and reproduction, and additionally,growth. Exposure via the standard (28 days) did not cause toxicity, but reproduction increased incommercial HA (significantly at 320 mg HA/kg) whereas via the extension (56 days) it decreased inall tested concentrations. Juveniles' size (56 days) was reduced in all tested nHA materials, exceptcommercial HA. nHA materials seem to trigger a compromise between reproduction and growth.Long-term effects could not be predicted based on the standard shorter exposure; hence, the testing ofat least two generations (56 days) is recommended to assess the toxicity of nanomaterials, particularlyin F. candida. Further, we found that the inclusion of size as additional endpoint is highly relevant.

Environmental hazards of nanobiomaterials - hydroxyapatite based NMs - a case study with Folsomia candida - effects from extended exposure

Elisabetta Campodoni;Monica Sandri;Simone Sprio;Magda Blosi;Anna Luisa Costa;
2022

Abstract

Hydroxyapatite (HA) is a calcium phosphate used in many fields, including biomedicalapplications. In particular, ion-doped HA nanomaterials (nHA) are developed for their increasedbioactivity, particularly in the fields of regenerative medicine and nanomedicine. In this study, weassessed the ecotoxicological impact of five nHA materials: a synthesized calcium hydroxyapatite(CaP-HA), superparamagnetic iron-doped hydroxyapatite (Fe-HA), titanium-doped hydroxyapatite(Ti-HA), alginate/titanium-doped hydroxyapatite hybrid composite (Ti-HA-Alg), and a commercial HA.The soil ecotoxicology model species Folsomia candida (Collembola) was used, and besides the standardreproduction test (28 days), an extension to the standard for one more generation was performed(56 days). Assessed endpoints included the standard survival and reproduction, and additionally,growth. Exposure via the standard (28 days) did not cause toxicity, but reproduction increased incommercial HA (significantly at 320 mg HA/kg) whereas via the extension (56 days) it decreased inall tested concentrations. Juveniles' size (56 days) was reduced in all tested nHA materials, exceptcommercial HA. nHA materials seem to trigger a compromise between reproduction and growth.Long-term effects could not be predicted based on the standard shorter exposure; hence, the testing ofat least two generations (56 days) is recommended to assess the toxicity of nanomaterials, particularlyin F. candida. Further, we found that the inclusion of size as additional endpoint is highly relevant.
2022
Istituto di Scienza, Tecnologia e Sostenibilità per lo Sviluppo dei Materiali Ceramici - ISSMC (ex ISTEC)
ecotoxicology
soil
invertebrates
long-term toxicity
nanobiomaterials
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
prod_476547-doc_194791.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Environmental Hazards of Nanobiomaterials (Hydroxyapatite-Based NMs)--A Case Study with Folsomia candida--Effects from Long Term Exposure
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 980.86 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
980.86 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/415595
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact