This paper investigates the performance of 25 wt% Ni/GDC catalyst supported on ceramic monolith (MO) and open-cell foam (FO) towards the conversion of CO to CH at bench-scale level (CO flow rate = 78-319 NL·h). Both structured catalysts were prepared by the In Situ-Solution Combustion Deposition (IS-SCD) method to coat thin, uniform and high-resistance catalytic layers (Ni/GDC). Catalysts were characterized by XRD, TEM, SEM, and adhesion tests. Temperature profiles in axial and radial direction were registered and discussed. The experimental results highlighted the effect of the geometry of the support on the thermal profile of the catalytic bed and, consequently, on the catalytic performance towards CO methanation. For the investigated quasi-adiabatic conditions, the monolith-supported sample enabled a favourable temperature distribution, leading to higher performances (? = 70.3%; F = 2.6 NL·cm·h) compared to the foam-based catalyst (? = 52.0%, F = 2.2 NL·cm·h). Besides, Ni/GDC-MO catalyst showed high stability for 50 h of time-on-stream under daily start-up and shut-down cycles.
High-temperature CO2 methanation over structured Ni/GDC catalysts: Performance and scale-up for Power-to-Gas application
Vita A;Italiano C;Pino L;Ferraro M;Antonucci V
2020
Abstract
This paper investigates the performance of 25 wt% Ni/GDC catalyst supported on ceramic monolith (MO) and open-cell foam (FO) towards the conversion of CO to CH at bench-scale level (CO flow rate = 78-319 NL·h). Both structured catalysts were prepared by the In Situ-Solution Combustion Deposition (IS-SCD) method to coat thin, uniform and high-resistance catalytic layers (Ni/GDC). Catalysts were characterized by XRD, TEM, SEM, and adhesion tests. Temperature profiles in axial and radial direction were registered and discussed. The experimental results highlighted the effect of the geometry of the support on the thermal profile of the catalytic bed and, consequently, on the catalytic performance towards CO methanation. For the investigated quasi-adiabatic conditions, the monolith-supported sample enabled a favourable temperature distribution, leading to higher performances (? = 70.3%; F = 2.6 NL·cm·h) compared to the foam-based catalyst (? = 52.0%, F = 2.2 NL·cm·h). Besides, Ni/GDC-MO catalyst showed high stability for 50 h of time-on-stream under daily start-up and shut-down cycles.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.