It is a known result that, when in an action prefix language like LOTOS we have both recursion and parallel composition operators, the finite-state behaviour of processes is in general lost. Actual1y, this happens also when other LOTOS operators, such as enabling or disabling, are used in a recursive context. The purpose of our paper is to study the expressive power of Basic LOTOS in terms of the relations between the syntactical structure and the finite-state behaviour of processes. We then define some sufficient conditions on the syntactical shape of the specifications in order to preserve the finite-state nature.
How expressive are LOTOS behaviour expressions?
Fantechi A;Gnesi S;
1991
Abstract
It is a known result that, when in an action prefix language like LOTOS we have both recursion and parallel composition operators, the finite-state behaviour of processes is in general lost. Actual1y, this happens also when other LOTOS operators, such as enabling or disabling, are used in a recursive context. The purpose of our paper is to study the expressive power of Basic LOTOS in terms of the relations between the syntactical structure and the finite-state behaviour of processes. We then define some sufficient conditions on the syntactical shape of the specifications in order to preserve the finite-state nature.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
prod_447183-doc_161102.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Descrizione: How expressive are LOTOS behaviour expressions?
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Dimensione
1.32 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.32 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.