Background: The study aim was to evaluate whether is possible to harmonize the results of two hs-cTnI methods using a recalibration procedure based on linear regression models and measured values of external quality assessment (EQA) and clinical samples. Methods: A two-step experimental approach was used. The preliminary step was performed using 16 EQA samples. The harmonization procedure was then validated by using 2530 heparinized plasma samples collected by 12 Italian University and Regional Hospitals from apparently healthy volunteers and patients admitted to emergency department with cardiac diseases. Two hs-cTnI methods were tested: Architect Stat High Sensitive Troponin-I, and the Access hs-cTnI using DxI platform. Linear regression models based on mean values measured with the two hs-cTni methods were used. Results: A significant reduction in the measurement bias between the two methods was found after recalibration procedure. The agreement between-methods improved of about 2.5 folds after recalibration, as assessed by reduction in mean CV values from 38.4% (SD 25.9%) before recalibration to 15.0% (SD 10.6%) after recalibration for hs-cTnI values <= 500 ng/L (n = 13, P = 0.0111 by non-parametric test for paired data). Conclusions: A recalibration procedure based on means of measured concentrations with hs-cTnI methods, which use monoclonal antibodies with similar binding characteristics, can be used to significantly reduce systematic bias and so to improve harmonization between methods. The results of this study can aid laboratorians and clinicians to better compare the concentrations respectively measured with the Architect and Access hs-cTnI methods.

Harmonization of two hs-cTnI methods based on recalibration of measured quality control and clinical samples

Ndreu R.
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
2020

Abstract

Background: The study aim was to evaluate whether is possible to harmonize the results of two hs-cTnI methods using a recalibration procedure based on linear regression models and measured values of external quality assessment (EQA) and clinical samples. Methods: A two-step experimental approach was used. The preliminary step was performed using 16 EQA samples. The harmonization procedure was then validated by using 2530 heparinized plasma samples collected by 12 Italian University and Regional Hospitals from apparently healthy volunteers and patients admitted to emergency department with cardiac diseases. Two hs-cTnI methods were tested: Architect Stat High Sensitive Troponin-I, and the Access hs-cTnI using DxI platform. Linear regression models based on mean values measured with the two hs-cTni methods were used. Results: A significant reduction in the measurement bias between the two methods was found after recalibration procedure. The agreement between-methods improved of about 2.5 folds after recalibration, as assessed by reduction in mean CV values from 38.4% (SD 25.9%) before recalibration to 15.0% (SD 10.6%) after recalibration for hs-cTnI values <= 500 ng/L (n = 13, P = 0.0111 by non-parametric test for paired data). Conclusions: A recalibration procedure based on means of measured concentrations with hs-cTnI methods, which use monoclonal antibodies with similar binding characteristics, can be used to significantly reduce systematic bias and so to improve harmonization between methods. The results of this study can aid laboratorians and clinicians to better compare the concentrations respectively measured with the Architect and Access hs-cTnI methods.
2020
Istituto di Fisiologia Clinica - IFC
Istituto Superconduttori, materiali innovativi e dispositivi - SPIN
Cardiac troponins
Harmonization
High-sensitivity method
Myocardial infarction
Quality control samples
Immunoassay methods
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S0009898120303259-main.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: Harmonization of two hs-cTnI methods based on recalibration of measured quality control and clinical samples
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 522.7 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
522.7 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/427039
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 16
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 13
social impact