SPS allowed for faster sintering but required an adjustment of the temperature to avoid fibre degradation compared to hot pressing. With similar porosity levels, we observed a slight decrease of flexural strength (300 vs 470 MPa), and an improvement of fracture toughness (15 vs 10 MPaVm) for SPSed samples. SPS was proved to be an effective method for the consolidation of continuous fibre reinforced UHTC composites.
Is spark plasma sintering suitable for the densification of continuous carbon fibre - UHTCMCs?
Zoli LucaPrimo
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;Vinci AntonioSecondo
Writing – Review & Editing
;Galizia PietroWriting – Review & Editing
;Sciti Diletta
Ultimo
Project Administration
2020
Abstract
SPS allowed for faster sintering but required an adjustment of the temperature to avoid fibre degradation compared to hot pressing. With similar porosity levels, we observed a slight decrease of flexural strength (300 vs 470 MPa), and an improvement of fracture toughness (15 vs 10 MPaVm) for SPSed samples. SPS was proved to be an effective method for the consolidation of continuous fibre reinforced UHTC composites.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
manuscript is spark plasma sintering.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: post print
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
1.69 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.69 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
