Aims: To compare different treatments for Non-Alcoholic Steato-Hepatitis (NASH) and todetermine an effectiveness hierarchy.Materials-and-Methods: This is a systematic review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis including randomized-controlled trials or prospective trials with at least 6 months follow-up and histologically-proven NASH in adult participants. Monte Carlo simulations were performed, each generating 10,000 data points, and results are reported as medians and 95% Credibility Intervals (CrIs). A meta-regression was conducted to find the effects of BMI decrement or reduction of HOMA-IR on NAFLD Activity Score (NAS) change.Results: The review identified 48 eligible trials comprising 2356 adults (55.6% men). Data were pooled using a random-effects model. The most effective treatments in terms of NAS reduction per semester were Pioglitazone and Roux-en-Y Gastric-ByPass (RYGB) (-1.50; 95% CrI: -2.08, -1.00 for Pioglitazione and -1.00; 95% CrI: -1.70, -0.32 for RYGB).Pioglitazone was also the best therapy for steatosis and lobular inflammation reduction; RYGB was the best treatment for hepatocellular ballooning reduction, whereas antioxidants appeared to be best for fibrosis improvement. For each 1% decrement in BMI, NAS was reduced by 1.3% (?=1.28%, P=0.01). Conversely, 1% reduction of HOMA-IR index reduced NAS by 0.3% (?=0.31%,P<0.001). Treatments that were regarded as promising, such as Elafibranor, Simtuzumab, Selonsertib, Cenicriviroc, Obeticholic acid and Liraglutide did not reduce either NAS or liver fibrosis significantly.Conclusions: Pioglitazione and RYGB are the most effective therapies for NASH. Antioxidants may be effective in reducing liver fibrosis. Weight loss and improvement of hepatic insulin resistance are promising approaches in the treatment of NASH.
Pioglitazone and bariatric surgery are the most effective treatments for non-alcoholic steato-hepatitis: a hierarchical network meta-analysis
Simona PanunziPrimo
;Andrea De Gaetano;
2020
Abstract
Aims: To compare different treatments for Non-Alcoholic Steato-Hepatitis (NASH) and todetermine an effectiveness hierarchy.Materials-and-Methods: This is a systematic review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis including randomized-controlled trials or prospective trials with at least 6 months follow-up and histologically-proven NASH in adult participants. Monte Carlo simulations were performed, each generating 10,000 data points, and results are reported as medians and 95% Credibility Intervals (CrIs). A meta-regression was conducted to find the effects of BMI decrement or reduction of HOMA-IR on NAFLD Activity Score (NAS) change.Results: The review identified 48 eligible trials comprising 2356 adults (55.6% men). Data were pooled using a random-effects model. The most effective treatments in terms of NAS reduction per semester were Pioglitazone and Roux-en-Y Gastric-ByPass (RYGB) (-1.50; 95% CrI: -2.08, -1.00 for Pioglitazione and -1.00; 95% CrI: -1.70, -0.32 for RYGB).Pioglitazone was also the best therapy for steatosis and lobular inflammation reduction; RYGB was the best treatment for hepatocellular ballooning reduction, whereas antioxidants appeared to be best for fibrosis improvement. For each 1% decrement in BMI, NAS was reduced by 1.3% (?=1.28%, P=0.01). Conversely, 1% reduction of HOMA-IR index reduced NAS by 0.3% (?=0.31%,P<0.001). Treatments that were regarded as promising, such as Elafibranor, Simtuzumab, Selonsertib, Cenicriviroc, Obeticholic acid and Liraglutide did not reduce either NAS or liver fibrosis significantly.Conclusions: Pioglitazione and RYGB are the most effective therapies for NASH. Antioxidants may be effective in reducing liver fibrosis. Weight loss and improvement of hepatic insulin resistance are promising approaches in the treatment of NASH.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Diabetes Obesity Metabolism - 2020 - Panunzi - Pioglitazone and bariatric surgery are the most effective treatments for.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
1.38 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.38 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.