Recent years have witnessed the proliferation of offensive content online such as fake news, propaganda, misinformation, and disinforma- tion. While initially this was mostly about textual content, over time images and videos gained popularity, as they are much easier to consume, attract more attention, and spread fur- ther than simple text. As a result, researchers started leveraging different modalities and com- binations thereof to combat online multimodal offensive content. In this study, we offer a sur- vey that carefully studies the state-of-the-art on multimodal disinformation detection cover- ing various combinations of modalities: text, images, speech, video, social media network structure, and temporal information. Moreover, while some studies focused on factuality, others investigated how harmful the content is. While these two components in the definition of disin- formation - (i) factuality, and (ii) harmfulness, are equally important, they are typically stud- ied in isolation. Thus, we argue for the need to tackle disinformation detection by taking into account multiple modalities as well as both fac- tuality and harmfulness, in the same framework. Finally, we discuss current challenges and fu- ture research directions.

A Survey on Multimodal Disinformation Detection

S Cresci;
2022

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed the proliferation of offensive content online such as fake news, propaganda, misinformation, and disinforma- tion. While initially this was mostly about textual content, over time images and videos gained popularity, as they are much easier to consume, attract more attention, and spread fur- ther than simple text. As a result, researchers started leveraging different modalities and com- binations thereof to combat online multimodal offensive content. In this study, we offer a sur- vey that carefully studies the state-of-the-art on multimodal disinformation detection cover- ing various combinations of modalities: text, images, speech, video, social media network structure, and temporal information. Moreover, while some studies focused on factuality, others investigated how harmful the content is. While these two components in the definition of disin- formation - (i) factuality, and (ii) harmfulness, are equally important, they are typically stud- ied in isolation. Thus, we argue for the need to tackle disinformation detection by taking into account multiple modalities as well as both fac- tuality and harmfulness, in the same framework. Finally, we discuss current challenges and fu- ture research directions.
2022
Istituto di informatica e telematica - IIT
Inglese
Proceedings - International Conference on Computational Linguistics, COLING
29th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, COLING 2022
29
1
6625
6643
19
Sì, ma tipo non specificato
12-17/10/2022
Gyeongju, Republic of Korea
disinformation
9
open
Alam, F; Cresci, S; Chakraborty, T; Silvestri, F; Dimitrov, D; Da San Martino, G; Shaar, S; Firooz, H; Nakov, P
273
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
04 Contributo in convegno::04.01 Contributo in Atti di convegno
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
prod_474473-doc_193552.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: A Survey on Multimodal Disinformation Detection
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 8.21 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
8.21 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/446857
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 78
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact