X-ray fluorescence (XRF) is a technique frequently used for the elemental analysis of cultural heritage materials. Depending on components selection (i.e. the primary source, the detector and the focusing optics, if present), the analytical performance of the spectrometer, and its consequent suitability for a given purpose, may vary considerably. In this paper, we compare the analytical performance of four different devices, two commercial and two expressly designed by the authors, and we consider two figures of merit: the limit of detection (LOD) and the standard error of regression (SER). The measurements are performed on a set of 19 copper alloy standards.

Comparison of the analytical performances of X-ray fluorescence devices

Ferretti M;
2022

Abstract

X-ray fluorescence (XRF) is a technique frequently used for the elemental analysis of cultural heritage materials. Depending on components selection (i.e. the primary source, the detector and the focusing optics, if present), the analytical performance of the spectrometer, and its consequent suitability for a given purpose, may vary considerably. In this paper, we compare the analytical performance of four different devices, two commercial and two expressly designed by the authors, and we consider two figures of merit: the limit of detection (LOD) and the standard error of regression (SER). The measurements are performed on a set of 19 copper alloy standards.
2022
Istituto di Scienze del Patrimonio Culturale - ISPC
XRF
portable
analytical performances
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
prod_470016-doc_191036.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Comparison of the analytical performances of X-ray fluorescence devices
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Dimensione 6.51 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
6.51 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/447937
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact