Detecting Generated Text and Attributing Language Model Source with Fine-tuned Models and Semantic Understanding

The improvements in natural language generation have led to the development of sophisticated language models capable of generating long and short texts that are incredibly difficult to distinguish from humanwritten ones. This remarkable generative capability has spread concerns about the potential misuse of such language models, such as the spread of misinformation, plagiarism, and causing disruption in the education system. Therefore, it is important to have automatic systems to distinguish generated texts from human-authored ones (deepfake text detection), as well as recognise the language model which produced a certain text for legal and security issues (generative language model attribution). The aim of the AuTexTification challenge was to address those two tasks on texts generated by state-of-the-art language models like text-davinci-003, being one of the first versions of the powerful ChatGPT. We proposed two detection models for both tasks: fine-tuned BERTweet and TriFuseNet, a three-branched network working on stylistic and contextual features. We achieved an F1 score of 0.616 (0.565) with fine-tuned BERTweet and 0.715 (0.499) with TriFuseNet on the deepfake text detection (generative language model attribution) task. Our results emphasize the significance of leveraging style, semantics, and context to distinguish machine-generated from human-written texts and identify the generative language model source.