Microsoft proposed RADAR in 2000, the first indoor positioning system based on Wi-Fi fingerprinting. Since then, the indoor research community has worked not only to improve the base estimator but also on finding an optimal RSS data representation. The long-term objective is to find a positioning system that minimises the mean positioning error. Despite the relevant advances in the last 23 years, a disruptive solution has not been reached yet. The evaluation with non-open datasets and comparisons with non-optimized baselines make the analysis of the current status of fingerprinting for indoor positioning difficult. In addition, the lack of implementation details or data used for evaluation in several works make results reproducibility impossible. This paper focuses on providing a comprehensive analysis of fingerprinting with k-NN and settling the basement for replicability and reproducibility in further works, targeting to bring relevant information about k-NN when it is used as a baseline comparison of advanced fingerprint-based methods.

Let's talk about k-NN for indoor positioning: myths and facts in RF-based fingerprinting

Crivello A;Barsocchi P;
2023

Abstract

Microsoft proposed RADAR in 2000, the first indoor positioning system based on Wi-Fi fingerprinting. Since then, the indoor research community has worked not only to improve the base estimator but also on finding an optimal RSS data representation. The long-term objective is to find a positioning system that minimises the mean positioning error. Despite the relevant advances in the last 23 years, a disruptive solution has not been reached yet. The evaluation with non-open datasets and comparisons with non-optimized baselines make the analysis of the current status of fingerprinting for indoor positioning difficult. In addition, the lack of implementation details or data used for evaluation in several works make results reproducibility impossible. This paper focuses on providing a comprehensive analysis of fingerprinting with k-NN and settling the basement for replicability and reproducibility in further works, targeting to bring relevant information about k-NN when it is used as a baseline comparison of advanced fingerprint-based methods.
2023
Istituto di Scienza e Tecnologie dell'Informazione "Alessandro Faedo" - ISTI
979-8-3503-2011-4
Indoor navigation
Radar
Fingerprint recognition
Reproducibility of results
Wireless fidelity
Replicability
Indoor positioning systems
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
prod_491506-doc_204991.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: Let's talk about k-NN for indoor positioning: myths and facts in RF-based fingerprinting
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Dimensione 297.9 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
297.9 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
prod_491506-doc_205015.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Preprint - Let's talk about k-NN for indoor positioning: myths and facts in RF-based fingerprinting
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Dimensione 297.35 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
297.35 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/452332
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact