We present the results of the regression contest organized for the LIBS 2022 conference. While the motivation and design of the contest are briefly presented, the work focuses on the methodologies of the three best-performing teams. The employed spectral preprocessing strategies, choice of regression models and its optimization are detailed for each team separately. The aim of the contest reflects the long-term challenges faced by quantitative laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) analysis. Thus, the contest was designed with the purpose of providing a transparent platform for comparing and evaluating the large range of data processing tools available in the LIBS literature. Namely, the contest consisted of the quantification of two major (Cr, Ni) and two minor (Mn, Mo) elements in 15 steel targets. For constructing an appropriate regression model, spectra of 42 targets were provided. The spectra were collected using a commercially available laboratory-based LIBS system and made publicly available. The contest lasted 53 days during which the teams did not receive feedback. In total, 21 teams participated out of which the three best-performing methodologies are presented here. A single linear partial least squares model and two artificial neural network regression models are presented. The corresponding feature selection strategies included emission line selection, spectral range selection, and automatized wavelength selection. Various spectral normalization strategies and data augmentation strategies are also presented.

Quantification of alloying elements in steel targets: The LIBS 2022 regression contest

Palleschi V.;De Giacomo A.;
2023

Abstract

We present the results of the regression contest organized for the LIBS 2022 conference. While the motivation and design of the contest are briefly presented, the work focuses on the methodologies of the three best-performing teams. The employed spectral preprocessing strategies, choice of regression models and its optimization are detailed for each team separately. The aim of the contest reflects the long-term challenges faced by quantitative laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) analysis. Thus, the contest was designed with the purpose of providing a transparent platform for comparing and evaluating the large range of data processing tools available in the LIBS literature. Namely, the contest consisted of the quantification of two major (Cr, Ni) and two minor (Mn, Mo) elements in 15 steel targets. For constructing an appropriate regression model, spectra of 42 targets were provided. The spectra were collected using a commercially available laboratory-based LIBS system and made publicly available. The contest lasted 53 days during which the teams did not receive feedback. In total, 21 teams participated out of which the three best-performing methodologies are presented here. A single linear partial least squares model and two artificial neural network regression models are presented. The corresponding feature selection strategies included emission line selection, spectral range selection, and automatized wavelength selection. Various spectral normalization strategies and data augmentation strategies are also presented.
2023
Istituto di Chimica dei Composti OrganoMetallici - ICCOM -
Istituto di Nanotecnologia - NANOTEC
Artificial neural networks; Feature selection; Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy; Partial least squares regression; Quantification of alloying elements; Regression analysis
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
prod_482593-doc_198702.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: Quantification of alloying elements in steel targets: The LIBS 2022 regression contest
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 12.56 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
12.56 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/456057
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact