The rise of sophisticated black-box machine learning models in Artificial Intelligence systems has prompted the need for explanation methods that reveal how these models work in an understandable way to users and decision makers. Unsurprisingly, the state-of-the-art exhibits currently a plethora of explainers providing many different types of explanations. With the aim of providing a compass for researchers and practitioners, this paper proposes a categorization of explanation methods from the perspective of the type of explanation they return, also considering the different input data formats. The paper accounts for the most representative explainers to date, also discussing similarities and discrepancies of returned explanations through their visual appearance. A companion website to the paper is provided as a continuous update to new explainers as they appear. Moreover, a subset of the most robust and widely adopted explainers, are benchmarked with respect to a repertoire of quantitative metrics.

Benchmarking and survey of explanation methods for black box models

Rinzivillo S
2023

Abstract

The rise of sophisticated black-box machine learning models in Artificial Intelligence systems has prompted the need for explanation methods that reveal how these models work in an understandable way to users and decision makers. Unsurprisingly, the state-of-the-art exhibits currently a plethora of explainers providing many different types of explanations. With the aim of providing a compass for researchers and practitioners, this paper proposes a categorization of explanation methods from the perspective of the type of explanation they return, also considering the different input data formats. The paper accounts for the most representative explainers to date, also discussing similarities and discrepancies of returned explanations through their visual appearance. A companion website to the paper is provided as a continuous update to new explainers as they appear. Moreover, a subset of the most robust and widely adopted explainers, are benchmarked with respect to a repertoire of quantitative metrics.
2023
Istituto di Scienza e Tecnologie dell'Informazione "Alessandro Faedo" - ISTI
Inglese
37
1719
1778
60
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10618-023-00933-9
Sì, ma tipo non specificato
Explainable artificial intelligence
Interpretable machine learning
Transparent models
Benchmarking
Internazionale
Elettronico
6
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Bodria, F; Giannotti, F; Guidotti, R; Naretto, F; Pedreschi, D; Rinzivillo, S
01 Contributo su Rivista::01.01 Articolo in rivista
open
   SoBigData++: European Integrated Infrastructure for Social Mining and Big Data Analytics
   SoBigData-PlusPlus
   H2020
   871042

   Science and technology for the explanation of AI decision making
   XAI
   H2020
   834756

   HumanE AI Network
   HumanE-AI-Net
   H2020
   952026

   Foundations of Trustworthy AI - Integrating Reasoning, Learning and Optimization
   TAILOR
   H2020
   952215

   SoBigData Research Infrastructure
   SoBigData
   European Commission
   Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
   654024
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
prod_486682-doc_201993.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Benchmarking and survey of explanation methods for black box models
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 4.68 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.68 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/457263
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 199
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 150
social impact